1996
DOI: 10.2307/1386413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Life-Altering Occurrences: A Test of the 'God-of-the-Gaps' Hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
81
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous research [28], participants in the current study were more likely to attribute God as a cause of positive than negative occurrences in the lives of other people. The present study makes a novel contribution by showing that the tendency to view God as causally responsible for positive occurrences was marginally increased when mortality was salient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with previous research [28], participants in the current study were more likely to attribute God as a cause of positive than negative occurrences in the lives of other people. The present study makes a novel contribution by showing that the tendency to view God as causally responsible for positive occurrences was marginally increased when mortality was salient.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Previous research has shown that attributions to God became more prevalent than attributions to the human agency of the actors or the influence of other people when the events were occurrences (in which the target seemingly had little control over the outcomes) than when the events were actions (in which the target seemingly had control over the outcomes) and that this effect was most pronounced when the consequences were life-altering and positive [28]. People seem most likely to evoke God as involved in the world when good and important things happen.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations