2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3105956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Individual and Collective Programming Students’ Behavior by Interpreting a Black-Box Predictive Model

Abstract: This work involved human subjects or animals in its research. The authors confirm that all human/animal subject research procedures and protocols are exempt from review board approval.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Um dos resultados mais atuais sobre a predic ¸ão de desempenho é a explicabilidade do modelo de aprendizagem de máquina [Pereira et al 2021a]. O grupo de pesquisa entende que uma resposta numérica obtida a partir de métodos caixa preta não atende aos anseios do professor e do aluno.…”
Section: Algumas Iniciativas E Resultadosunclassified
“…Um dos resultados mais atuais sobre a predic ¸ão de desempenho é a explicabilidade do modelo de aprendizagem de máquina [Pereira et al 2021a]. O grupo de pesquisa entende que uma resposta numérica obtida a partir de métodos caixa preta não atende aos anseios do professor e do aluno.…”
Section: Algumas Iniciativas E Resultadosunclassified
“…Moreover, this human support would help the AI to improve its rules to and to become even more precise in annotating topics. Furthermore, such human/AI interaction is claimed by the literature [13,24,38] to be dominant in modern systems. The reason is that humans and AI have different strengths and weaknesses, and the combination of the heterogeneous intelligence of both agents can be quite powerful.…”
Section: Applications and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of online judges in education to evaluate students' programs has brought many advantages [54,44,56,5,26,20,38,43]. First, the instructor could assess the correctness of students' submissions more efficiently and accurately.…”
Section: Online Judgesmentioning
confidence: 99%