2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz3182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining GRB prompt emission with sub-photospheric dissipation and Comptonization

Abstract: Even though the observed spectra for GRB prompt emission is well constrained, no single radiation mechanism can robustly explain its distinct non-thermal nature.Here we explore the radiation mechanism with the photospheric emission model using our Monte Carlo Radiative Transfer (MCRaT) code. We study the sub-photospheric Comptonization of fast cooled synchrotron photons while the Maxwellian electrons and mono-energetic protons are accelerated to relativistic energies by repeated dissipation events. Unlike prev… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main assumption of that work is the presence of unknown dissipation mechanism, which transforms part of the kinetic energy of the outflow into radiation, postulated in (Rees & Mészáros 2005). Such dissipation can boost the luminosity of thermal emission and it might be required to explain subdominant thermal component during the prompt emission or even the prompt emission itself, see (Bhattacharya & Kumar 2020). Concerning observations of this component in the early afterglow, dissipation is not required, as it is much weaker than the prompt radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main assumption of that work is the presence of unknown dissipation mechanism, which transforms part of the kinetic energy of the outflow into radiation, postulated in (Rees & Mészáros 2005). Such dissipation can boost the luminosity of thermal emission and it might be required to explain subdominant thermal component during the prompt emission or even the prompt emission itself, see (Bhattacharya & Kumar 2020). Concerning observations of this component in the early afterglow, dissipation is not required, as it is much weaker than the prompt radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…observed short-duration (10 −3 -10 3 s) prompt emission seen in the keV-MeV energy range (Meszaros, Rees & Papathanassiou 1994;Daigne & Mochkovitch 1998; or, alternatively, the jet energy can be dissipated below the photosphere (R ∼ 10 12 cm) and released at the photosphere (e.g. Rees & Mészáros 2005;Pe'er 2008;Beloborodov 2010;Lazzati et al 2013;Bhattacharya & Kumar 2020).…”
Section: γ -Ray Burstsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the prompt emission can be released at the photosphere, from subphotospheric dissipation (e.g. Rees & Mészáros 2005;Pe'er 2008;Beloborodov 2010;Lazzati et al 2013;Bhattacharya & Kumar 2020). The subphotospheric dissipation can proceed through different mechanisms.…”
Section: Jet Dissipation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this scenario, the spectral peak and the low-energy part of the spectrum at photon energies E < E pk are formed by quasithermal Comptonization of soft seed photons up to the thermal peak by mildly relativistic electrons when the flow is optically thick with Thomson optical depth 1 τ T 100 (e.g. Eichler & Levinson 2000;Pe'er & Waxman 2004;Rees & Mészáros 2005;Giannios & Spruit 2007;Beloborodov 2013;Vurm, Lyubarsky & Piran 2013;Bhattacharya & Kumar 2020). Continued dissipation as the flow becomes optically thin (τ T < 1) then gives rise to the high-energy part of the spectrum at photon energies E > E pk (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%