1994
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1994.9412190219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Gender-Based Selection Decisions: A Synthesis Of contextual and Cognitive Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
120
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use this model as a tool to understand the segregating effects of referring, to explain the contributions of referral processes to job segregation, and to compare referring's segregating effects with those of another major segregating mechanism -hiring biases (Perry, Davis-Blake and Kulik, 1994).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use this model as a tool to understand the segregating effects of referring, to explain the contributions of referral processes to job segregation, and to compare referring's segregating effects with those of another major segregating mechanism -hiring biases (Perry, Davis-Blake and Kulik, 1994).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it can be argued that the more diverse the workforce, the more likely that its members will be familiar with, and tolerant of ISSN 2162-3058 2015 www.macrothink.org/ijhrs 57 differences between people. Researchers have also found that current composition of the workforce can affect future levels of minority segregation (Perry et al 1994). Thus, low level of diversity (tokenism) can produce negative outcomes (alienation and pressure), while "appropriate" level of diversity would produce positive outcomes (inclusion and social networks) (Blau, 1977;Kanter, 1977).…”
Section: Breadth and Depth Of Workforce Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific working practices such as comprehensive employee recruitment and selection, incentive compensation and performance management systems, extensive employee involvement and training have been argued to improve employees" knowledge, skills and abilities which will subsequently increase their level of motivation and willingness to stay (Huselid, 1995;Jones & Wright, 1992). The relevance of organisational policy and practice vis-à-vis workforce diversity is anchored in theoretical and empirical evidences, which suggest that organisational policy, and practice can influence employee attitudes and behavior ( Black and Mendenhall, 1990;Black et al 1991;Cox, 1991;Harris, 1994;Heery, 1994;Jackson, et al, 1992;Jenner, 1994;Konrad & Linnehan, 1994;McNerney, 1994a;Perry, Davis-Blake & Kulik, 1994;Smith, 1994;Stephenson & Krebs, 1993;Tung, 1993). For example, organisational policy and practice can either support or hinder employee integration and commitment.…”
Section: Organizational Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender imbalance may also be described as gender segregation in an organization where perhaps women work in distress due to minority. Many multinational companies like Unilever formalize organizational disciplines such as job ladders not only to create equal opportunities to in respect to gender, race and religion but also to solve the gender segregation issues (Perry et al, 1994). However beliefs about appropriate age or level of attractiveness may be meticulously examined by the companies while implementing the gender related policies towards improving the workplace environment.…”
Section: Gender Sensitivity Issues At Workplacementioning
confidence: 99%