Explaining experiences of community-dwelling older adults with a pro-active comprehensive geriatric assessment program – a thorough evaluation by interviews

Abstract

IntroductionPro-active assessment programs are increasingly used to improve care for older adults. These programs include comprehensive geriatric tailored to individual patient preferences. Evidence for the effects of these programs on patient outcomes is nevertheless scarce or ambiguous. Explaining these dissatisfying results is difficult due to the multi-component nature of the programs. The objective of the current study was to explore and explain the experience of older adults participating in a pro-active assessment program, to help to clarify the effects.MethodsSemi-structured in-depth interviews were held with 25 participants of a pro-active assessment program for frail community-dwelling adults aged 65+. This study was part of an evaluation study on the effects of the program. Transcripts were analysed with thematic analysis and cross-case analysis.ResultsThe participants’ mean age was 78.5 (SD 6.9) and 56% was female. The majority of the participants were satisfied with the program but based this on communication aspects, since only a few of them expressed real program benefits. Participant experiences could be clustered in six themes: (1) All participants expressed the need for a holistic view which was covered in the program, (2) the scope of the CGA was broader than expected or unclear, (3) the program delivered unexpected but valued help, (4) participants described a very low sense of ownership, (5) timing of the program implementation or the CGA was difficult and(6), participants and care workers had a different view on what to consider as a problem. These experiences could be explained by three program components: the degree of (the lack of) integration of the program within usual care, the pro-active screening method and the broader than expected, but appreciated multi-domain approach.ConclusionOlder adults’ need for a holistic view is covered by this outpatient assessment program. However, their engagement and the correct timing of the program are hampered by the pro-active recruitment and the limited integration of the program within existing care. Furthermore, satisfaction seems an insufficient guiding factor when evaluating CGA programs for older adults because it does not reflect the impact of the program.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12877-018-1025-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Experiences with and attitudes towards geriatric screening among older emergency department patients: a qualitative study

“…Furthermore, participants described the importance of a holistic approach to unravel the older patient as a whole beyond just the medical complaints. The need of older people to receive holistic care and to be involved in decision-making has been described previously for the ED setting [ 25 ], and is corresponding to literature in community-dwelling older people and older patients in regular health care [ 26 – 29 ]. Our findings suggest that screening could aid in reaching this goal and additionally could help to comfort patients by means of attention for them as a person.…”

Increasing Older Adult Involvement in Geriatric Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation

“…Goal setting was highly implemented, with 90% of all letters to GPs containing at least one goal for which desire talk was prevalent. The mapping of these individual needs and wishes within goals is central to person-centered care (World Health Organization, 2015a) and was reflected in the positive attitudes of participants toward the service (Rietkerk, Smit, et al, 2019). However, only a minority of the formulated goals contained aspects that were expected to increase the potential for behavior change.…”

“…We also searched for explanations for the extent of performance by analyzing the judgments and experiences of care professionals who had used MI and goal setting. The process analysis focused on the perspectives of care professionals because the perspectives of older adults were thoroughly considered in another study (Rietkerk, Smit, et al, 2019). Figure 1 shows the relation between the intervention components, the questions used in the process evaluation, and the data sources.…”

Exercise training in patients after kidney transplantation

“…Not a single study reported exercise benefits on isolated postural balance. Although often neglected, the clinical value of exercise training to reduce falls and related complications is not to be underestimated [ 60 , 61 ].…”