2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.911274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explaining Compassion Organizing Competence

Abstract: who provided extra material and enthusiasm for the data we collected. We appreciate the support of the William Russell Kelly Chair and the Edgar F. Kaiser Chair in preparation of this paper. Finally, we thank the members of the Big Ten University Business School who shared their insights that become the basis for this organizing model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 127 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…defines self-compassion as caring oneself when the person is suffering rather than harshly judging oneself or ignoring one's pain, and the person considers one's own experience as a part of shared human condition Compassion at work means when employees and employers perceive and respond to the pain which their coworkers are suffering, they try to relax them and comfort them in a unified way. Compassion differs in terms of the situation, and it also influences organizational outcomes (Dutton, Worline, Frost, & Lilius, 2006). There is support in the literature for the proposed relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…defines self-compassion as caring oneself when the person is suffering rather than harshly judging oneself or ignoring one's pain, and the person considers one's own experience as a part of shared human condition Compassion at work means when employees and employers perceive and respond to the pain which their coworkers are suffering, they try to relax them and comfort them in a unified way. Compassion differs in terms of the situation, and it also influences organizational outcomes (Dutton, Worline, Frost, & Lilius, 2006). There is support in the literature for the proposed relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%