2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explainable machine learning models for predicting the axial compression capacity of concrete filled steel tubular columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Solhmirzaei et al (2020) presented a data-driven ML framework, which uses multiple ML algorithms to predict the failure mode and shear capacity of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) beams. In addition, the importance of explainability in ML models is highlighted in a study by Cakiroglu et al (2022). They developed data-driven ML models using 719 experiments to predict the axial compression capacity of rectangular concrete-filled steel tubular columns Cakiroglu et al (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Solhmirzaei et al (2020) presented a data-driven ML framework, which uses multiple ML algorithms to predict the failure mode and shear capacity of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) beams. In addition, the importance of explainability in ML models is highlighted in a study by Cakiroglu et al (2022). They developed data-driven ML models using 719 experiments to predict the axial compression capacity of rectangular concrete-filled steel tubular columns Cakiroglu et al (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the importance of explainability in ML models is highlighted in a study by Cakiroglu et al (2022). They developed data-driven ML models using 719 experiments to predict the axial compression capacity of rectangular concrete-filled steel tubular columns Cakiroglu et al (2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almustafa and Nehdi (2022) developed a prediction model of the maximum displacement of RC columns exposed to blast loading using ensemble tree-based algorithms. Many scholars have also tried to predict the axial loading bearing capacity of CFST columns with various machining learning techniques including artificial neural network (ANN), random forest, gradient boosting, support vector machines (SVM) and genetic algorithms, and so on (Cakiroglu et al, 2022; Hou and Zhou, 2022; Naser et al, 2021; Vu et al, 2021). The machine learning-based prediction models all yield extremely high prediction accuracy since there are up to 3000 available axial compression tests of CFST columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of the ultimate loads of rectangular columns undergoing axial loading was conducted by Cakiroglu et al using machine learning models. The predicted ultimate loads presented a high accuracy of up to 98.3% [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%