2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata.2017.8258391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explainable data-driven modeling of patient satisfaction survey data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tree-based models can provide feature importance at a global level but not in a specific case. The local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) algorithm is developed to identify an interpretable model that is locally faithful for each individual prediction [27,28]. It provides relative feature contributions for a single instance of the prediction result.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree-based models can provide feature importance at a global level but not in a specific case. The local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) algorithm is developed to identify an interpretable model that is locally faithful for each individual prediction [27,28]. It provides relative feature contributions for a single instance of the prediction result.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the disadvantages of the black-box machine learning model and provide physicians with more information on the prediction model in clinical practice, we used the local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) algorithm to interpret feature contributions for each prediction [19,29,30]. LIME analysis revealed the probability score as well as the cutoff for prediction by the model.…”
Section: Model Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research has touched on the differences between decision maker perspectives on these different measurements, but the results remain limited. Liu, et al [27] for instance demonstrated challenges with interpretations of patient satisfaction measurements. They conclude that without more development on the satisfaction measure practitioners would face difficulty with maximizing patient satisfaction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%