2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explainable anomaly detection framework for predictive maintenance in manufacturing systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are exploring the incorporation of a multi-class classification scheme that differentiates between 'normal', 'warning', and 'abnormal' states within the manufacturing process. By employing this expanded taxonomy, we can shed light on the potential causes of anomalous conditions and enhance the interpretability of our anomaly detection system [5,32]. This labeling approach will offer a more meaningful understanding of the underlying causes behind the predicted failures.…”
Section: A Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We are exploring the incorporation of a multi-class classification scheme that differentiates between 'normal', 'warning', and 'abnormal' states within the manufacturing process. By employing this expanded taxonomy, we can shed light on the potential causes of anomalous conditions and enhance the interpretability of our anomaly detection system [5,32]. This labeling approach will offer a more meaningful understanding of the underlying causes behind the predicted failures.…”
Section: A Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, our LSTM-autoencoder model is a DL algorithm composed of many parameters and layers. However, there still exists the black box issue: it is difficult to understand the prediction results of anomalies using DL technologies [5]. Explanations are required for the results predicted as anomalies [5,32].…”
Section: B Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations