Explainable and Interpretable Models in Computer Vision and Machine Learning

Abstract

We introduce a new approach to functional causal modeling from observational data, called Causal Generative Neural Networks (CGNN). CGNN leverages the power of neural networks to learn a generative model of the joint distribution of the observed variables, by minimizing the Maximum Mean Discrepancy between generated and observed data. An approximate learning criterion is proposed to scale the computational cost of the approach to linear complexity in the number of observations. The performance of CGNN is studied throughout three experiments. Firstly, CGNN is applied to cause-effect inference, where the task is to identify the best causal hypothesis out of "X → Y " and "Y → X". Secondly, CGNN is applied to the problem of identifying v-structures and conditional independences. Thirdly, CGNN is applied to multivariate functional causal modeling: given a skeleton describing the direct dependences in a set of random variables X = [X 1 , . . . , X d ], CGNN orients the edges in the skeleton to uncover the directed acyclic causal graph describing the causal structure of the random variables. On all three tasks, CGNN is extensively assessed on both artificial and real-world data, comparing favorably to the state-of-the-art. Finally, CGNN is extended to handle the case of confounders, where latent variables are involved in the overall causal model. Keywords: generative neural networks · causal structure discovery · cause-effect pair problem · functional causal models · structural equation models * *

“Where’s the I-O?” Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Talent Management Systems

“…Vendors who develop AI/ML talent assessment products and the companies that use them should strive to maximize benefits while mitigating risks to both job applicants (e.g., data privacy) and the organization (e.g., legal repercussions). Regarding data privacy, the Global Data Protection Regulations (GDPR, 2016) in the European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA) present challenges by requiring companies to disclose the use of AI/ML to applicants and remain transparent about the data used to make selection decisions (Liem et al, 2018). Similar legislation is emerging in the United States, such as in Illinois, where employers must obtain applicants' consent to use AI/ML in their hiring processes (Bologna, 2019).…”

The use of artificial intelligence tools in cancer detection compared to the traditional diagnostic imaging methods: An overview of the systematic reviews

“…Symbolic approaches, on the other hand, are more easily understood while being generally seen as less effective. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the introduction of counterfactual explanations might aid the user in comprehending a model’s conclusion [ 90 – 92 ].…”

“…Many of these algorithms, however, are unable to articulate to human users why they made certain decisions and took certain actions. Explanations are necessary for users to comprehend, have faith in, and manage these new artificially intelligent partners in the crucial knowledge domains of defense, medical, finance, and law for exemplo [74][75][76].…”

An Empirical Comparison of Interpretable Models to Post-Hoc Explanations

“…Numerous research studies have been conducted on the explainability and interpretability of black-box models. We refer to [8][9][10] for general surveys and only briefly recapitulate the most relevant works for our study. In particular, we are interested in comparing works in two major categories: directly learning interpretable methods and post-hoc explanation methods.…”