2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3110270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explainability of Machine Learning Models for Bankruptcy Prediction

Abstract: As the amount of data increases, it is more likely that the assumptions in the existing economic analysis model are unsatisfied or make it difficult to establish a new analysis model. Therefore, there has been increased demand for applying the machine learning methodology to bankruptcy prediction due to its high performance. By contrast, machine learning models usually operate as black-boxes but credit rating regulatory systems require the provisioning of appropriate information regarding credit rating standar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this author, failure of construction companies is caused by high level of current liabilities. CPR Šnircová [62]; Mendes et al [97]; Lin et al [69]; Du Jardin [93]; Jabeur [98]; Wyrobek [99]; Karas and Srbova [63]; Shen et al [44]; Park et al [81]; Qian et al [86]; Smith and Alvarez [87] Source: authors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to this author, failure of construction companies is caused by high level of current liabilities. CPR Šnircová [62]; Mendes et al [97]; Lin et al [69]; Du Jardin [93]; Jabeur [98]; Wyrobek [99]; Karas and Srbova [63]; Shen et al [44]; Park et al [81]; Qian et al [86]; Smith and Alvarez [87] Source: authors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROAAltman[50]; Li and Sun[65]; Hu[88]; Chen and Du[66]; Premachandra et al[89]; Kainulainen et al[67]; Zhou et al[90]; Cultera and Bredart[61]; Zelenkov et al[72]; Volkov et al[74]; Korol[43]; Farooq and Qamar[76]; Shen et al[44]; Tumpach et al[78]; Qian et al[86]; Pavlicko and Mazanec[84] TATR Altman[50]; Platt and Platt[91]; Li and Sun[65]; Chen and Du[66]; Kainulainen et al[67]; Tomczak et al[92]; Rež ňáková and Karas[70]; Lin et al[69]; Zelenkov et al[72]; Du Jardin[93]; Chou et al[73]; Vuković et al[77]; Park et al[81]; Chen et al[31]; Rahman et al[80]; Papíková and Papík[83]; Pavlicko and Mazanec[84] TDTA Šnircová[62]; Platt and Platt[91]; Premachandra et al[89]; Chen and Du[66]; Hu[88]; Yeh et al[94]; Kainulainen et al[67]; Rež ňáková and Karas[70]; Lin et al[69]; Zhou et al[90]; Chou et al[73]; Volkov et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors apply the decision trees method (Aoki and Hosonuma 2004;Zibanezhad et al 2011;Begović and Bonić 2020), some others utilize various machine learning techniques such as genetic algorithm (Shin and Lee 2002;Kim and Han 2003;Davalos et al 2014), support vector machine (Shin et al 2005;Härdle et al 2005;Dellepiane et al 2015) and random forest (Joshi et al 2018;Ptak-Chmielewska and Matuszyk 2020;Gurnani et al 2021). Recently, several comparative analyses of machine learning models have been carried out to predict bankruptcy (Narvekar and Guha 2021;Park et al 2021;Bragoli et al 2022;Máté et al 2023;Martono and Ohwada 2023).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a tree-based gradient boosting machine learning model with binary logistic objectives, XGBoost (XGB) [18]. This model is a decision-tree-based ensemble machine learning model known for its powerful performance in classification problems in various fields [19,20]. Since this is a tree-based model, it has the advantage of being able to process data with missing values [21].…”
Section: Training and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%