Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2578153.2578189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experts vs. novices

Abstract: We present in this paper a novel study aiming at identifying the differences in visual search patterns between physicians of diverse levels of expertise during the screening of colonoscopy videos. Physicians were clustered into two groups -experts and novices-according to the number of procedures performed, and fixations were captured by an eye-tracker device during the task of polyp search in different video sequences. These fixations were integrated into heat maps, one for each cluster. The obtained maps wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different approaches for comparing gaze behavior in dynamic scenes. Besides using metrics such as reaction time, dwelling time in AoIs and energy concentration ratios (Bernal et al, 2014;Fontana et al, 2017), some approaches take into account scan patterns. These approaches are based on evaluating similarity with sequence alignment scores followed by testing for statistical differences (Feusner & Lukoff, 2008) or providing a similarity score for two scanpaths based on their morphology and, optionally, duration in an AoI (Frame, Warren, & Maresca 2018).…”
Section: Existing Techniques For Dynamic Group Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are different approaches for comparing gaze behavior in dynamic scenes. Besides using metrics such as reaction time, dwelling time in AoIs and energy concentration ratios (Bernal et al, 2014;Fontana et al, 2017), some approaches take into account scan patterns. These approaches are based on evaluating similarity with sequence alignment scores followed by testing for statistical differences (Feusner & Lukoff, 2008) or providing a similarity score for two scanpaths based on their morphology and, optionally, duration in an AoI (Frame, Warren, & Maresca 2018).…”
Section: Existing Techniques For Dynamic Group Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploring gaze behavior is a popular research method in many domains, since it can tell us how we are filtering information and how we might differ in our perception. Examples of between-group comparisons include differences in gaze behavior of experts and laymen (Bernal et al, 2014;Giovinco et al, 2014;Harezlak, Kasprowski, & Kasprowska, 2018), differences between elderly and younger people (Fontana et al, 2017) or differences in visual exploration due to native language (Stutterheim, Andermann, Carroll, Flecken, & Mertins, 2012). Besides comparisons of natural groups, differences in gaze behavior are studied subject to different experimental conditions like manual driving and highly automated driving (Navarro, Mara Stadler mara.stadler@helmholtz-muenchen.de Extended author information available on the last page of the article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%