2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10824-015-9239-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experts’ awards and economic success: evidence from an Italian literary prize

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis indicates that winning the Grimme Prize is expected to have a slightly positive effect on the audience reach of a journalistic broadcast compared to that of winless nominees when considering the overall population. These findings mainly confirm the results of existent literature, which tend to discern a positive effect of media awards on product sales (Logan and Sutter, 2004;Nelson et al, 2001;Ponzo and Scoppa, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis indicates that winning the Grimme Prize is expected to have a slightly positive effect on the audience reach of a journalistic broadcast compared to that of winless nominees when considering the overall population. These findings mainly confirm the results of existent literature, which tend to discern a positive effect of media awards on product sales (Logan and Sutter, 2004;Nelson et al, 2001;Ponzo and Scoppa, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Also, the authors cannot explicitly differentiate between the effect of the inherent product quality and the effect of the quality signal on circulation. Ponzo and Scoppa (2015) offer an approach to address the endogeneity problem by examining the impact of winning the Italian Strega Prize on book sales based on a DD approach. They compare the sales development of the award winning books to the sales development of the nominated titles.…”
Section: The Causality Problem Between Quality Media Awards and Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only aspects of value about awards may be considered to be the ancillary income. It has been empirically shown, for instance, that recipients financially profit from having been awarded a major book prize (Chan et al ., ; Ponzo and Scoppa, ). Awards can also improve the health of their recipients.…”
Section: The Academic Study Of Awardsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We have studied both types of consensus for the book industry, although passive consumption somewhat limitedly. A number of studies have tried to relate awards to sales, which is beyond our scope here (Ashworth, Heyndels, & Werck, 2010; Clement, Proppe, & Rott, 2007; Ponzo & Scoppa, 2015). We have only looked at the overlap between bestseller lists and award winners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are studied as signifiers of cultural value (English, 2005;Schmutz, 2005), and as signals of quality in a market dominated by quality uncertainty (Ackerberg, 2003;Gemser, Leenders, & Wijnberg, 2008;Ginsburgh, 2003;Peltoniemi, 2015). A number of studies have analyzed the effect that awards have on the success of products in markets, especially in the film market (Nelson, Donihue, Waldman, & Wheaton, 2001;Ponzo & Scoppa, 2015;Zhuang, Babin, Xiao, & Paun, 2013). And there is a gradual development of the role of awards in a broader economics of attention (Dekker & Popik, 2014;English, 2005;Frey & Gallus, 2015;Ginsburgh & Weyers, 2014;Muniesa & Helgesson, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%