1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02323.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expertise and configural coding in face recognition

Abstract: Diamond & Carey (1986) have argued that expertise in face recognition depends on the ability to code configural properties in addition to isolated features. We tested this hypothesis in two experiments by comparing the effect of inversion on recognition of 'own race' (high expertise) and 'other race' (low expertise) faces. Use of configural information should be associated with a larger inversion effect than use of isolated features, and therefore inversion should produce a larger recognition decrement for own… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
350
3
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 343 publications
(377 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
19
350
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This common manipulation is thought to differentially disrupt coding subtle variations in the configuration of facial features (Diamond & Carey, 1986;Farah, Tanaka, & Drain, 1995;Rhodes, Brake, & Atkinson, 1993). This configural coding process is considered the hallmark of face coding and is probably the source of our ability to accurately differentiate members of this homogeneous class (Diamond & Carey, 1986;Rhodes, Tan, Brake, & Taylor, 1989). Therefore, if CP depends on expertise-based configural coding, any CP effects that appeared in Experiment I were expected to disappear in the inverted faces in Experiment 2.…”
Section: Testing the Limits Of Cp In Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This common manipulation is thought to differentially disrupt coding subtle variations in the configuration of facial features (Diamond & Carey, 1986;Farah, Tanaka, & Drain, 1995;Rhodes, Brake, & Atkinson, 1993). This configural coding process is considered the hallmark of face coding and is probably the source of our ability to accurately differentiate members of this homogeneous class (Diamond & Carey, 1986;Rhodes, Tan, Brake, & Taylor, 1989). Therefore, if CP depends on expertise-based configural coding, any CP effects that appeared in Experiment I were expected to disappear in the inverted faces in Experiment 2.…”
Section: Testing the Limits Of Cp In Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CP effect is significant in both cases and is, The significant CP effect observed in other-race faces suggests that CP in unfamiliar faces generalizes to faces from unfamiliar groups. Given findings by Fallshore and Schooler (1995) and Rhodes et al (1989) implying that configural coding is not present or reduced in other-race faces, it is possible that CP does not depend on the availability ofthis process. This runs counter to recent research suggesting that configural coding underlies the CP effect (Campbell, Pascalis, Coleman, Wallace, & Benson, 1997;de Gelder et aI., 1997).…”
Section: Discrimination Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further address concerns about ecological validity, we have replicated robust phenomena in the face literature using the computer generated faces in a second experiment. First, we show superior memory for upright compared to inverted faces (i.e., the face inversion effect; Yin, 1969;see Rossion & Gauthier, 2002, for a review), second we show better recognition memory for own-race than other-race faces (i.e., the cross-race effect; Lindsay, Jack, & Christian, 1991), and finally we show a larger effect of inversion for own-race faces than other-race faces (the interaction between the two; Rhodes, Brake, Taylor, & Tan, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Indeed participants could have based their judgments on low level stimulus features such as contrast or perhaps single features within each face. To determine whether the visual system responds to these computer-generated faces in a manner similar to real faces we attempted to replicate the well known interaction between face inversion and face race in a short memory experiment (Rhodes, Brake, Taylor, & Tan, 1989).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When doing recognition memory test experiment, after the screen shows pictures, after the examinees pressed the button the picture disappearance and the response button and time are recorded. If no response within 3 seconds, the picture will disappear and this test is considered as non-effective response (Rhodes, 1989).…”
Section: Experiments Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%