Expert writers’ structural outlines in research papers: An inquiry into social sciences

Luo, Xianqing; Lim, Jason Miin-Hwa

doi:10.2989/16073614.2021.1942099

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The confusion of specific terminology in research paper classifications, such as fulllength articles and original papers, is a prevalent problem among inexperienced researchers in the social, arts, and humanities fields. The confusion is apparent in the evaluation of novelty in scholarly investigations (Șuteu, 2022), the application of structural frameworks in social science research (Luo and Lim, 2021), the correlation between paradigm, methodology, design, and method in research (Okesina, 2020), and the comprehension of various categories of peer-reviewed articles (Sansom, 2019). These studies emphasise the importance of providing precise definitions and explanations of this terminology to assist in the growth of inexperienced researchers in these disciplines.…”

Section: Specific Terminology Of Research Paper Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Methodology Confusion Among Novice Social Sciences and Humanities Researchers

TUMIRAN

2024

qjssh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research methodology in the social sciences and humanities entails a methodical approach to studying social phenomena, context, and human behaviour using qualitative, quantitative, or hybrid research techniques. However, the intricate nature of research methods in the social sciences and humanities often poses substantial difficulties for inexperienced researchers and may result in perplexity and mistakes. The objective of this study is to review the research methodology confusion among novice researchers in the social sciences and humanities. This study entails a content analysis approach to discovering pertinent material on the difficulties faced by inexperienced researchers in comprehending research methodology. This study has identified several points of research methodology confusion among novice researchers in the social sciences and humanities, namely: (a) normality tests and validity/reliability tests; (b) parametric and non-parametric tests; (c) sampling determination between experiments and social research; (d) literature review and manuscript analysis; (e) a review and an original qualitative paper; (f) specific terminology of research paper types; and (g) independent and dependent of sample and variable. In conclusion, this study reveals the widespread lack of clarity among inexperienced researchers in the social sciences and humanities when it comes to fundamental ideas, concepts, and research methods.

show abstract

Section: Specific Terminology Of Research Paper Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Methodology Confusion Among Novice Social Sciences and Humanities Researchers

TUMIRAN

2024

qjssh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Writers' communicative resources for comparing present and past research findings: A pedagogically motivated inquiry into scientists' rhetorical practices

Guo,

Lim

2024

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Establishing a research territory in economics: Implications for academic writing instruction

Liu

Lim

2023

Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Expert writers’ structural outlines in research papers: An inquiry into social sciences

Cited by 3 publications

References 40 publications

Research Methodology Confusion Among Novice Social Sciences and Humanities Researchers

Research Methodology Confusion Among Novice Social Sciences and Humanities Researchers

Writers' communicative resources for comparing present and past research findings: A pedagogically motivated inquiry into scientists' rhetorical practices

Establishing a research territory in economics: Implications for academic writing instruction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About