2018
DOI: 10.1080/1573062x.2018.1529806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expert system for selecting and prioritizing projects for handling urban water supply crises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The definitions of the scales of the criteria were substantiated in the work of Beinat (1997), Alegre et al (2000), Froukh (2001), Albuquerque (2004), and Brasil et al (2009, 2021), in concordance with the actors involved in the decision‐making process. The effort to make the study feasible coincides with the practical considerations of Beinat (1997), with the typical characteristics of Brazilian cities (unstructured sanitation companies, lack of human and financial resources, management deficiencies, empirical operation of water systems, and lack of data, among others, according to Silva, 2012) and supports the option of criteria scales used. Practical considerations are as follows: To formulate the scale, the Semantic Judgment method was used; as justification, there is an attempt to overcome difficulties with imprecision, according to Beinat (1997).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The definitions of the scales of the criteria were substantiated in the work of Beinat (1997), Alegre et al (2000), Froukh (2001), Albuquerque (2004), and Brasil et al (2009, 2021), in concordance with the actors involved in the decision‐making process. The effort to make the study feasible coincides with the practical considerations of Beinat (1997), with the typical characteristics of Brazilian cities (unstructured sanitation companies, lack of human and financial resources, management deficiencies, empirical operation of water systems, and lack of data, among others, according to Silva, 2012) and supports the option of criteria scales used. Practical considerations are as follows: To formulate the scale, the Semantic Judgment method was used; as justification, there is an attempt to overcome difficulties with imprecision, according to Beinat (1997).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The research focused on the search for topics such as the water crisis in Brasilia, decision analysis, and design alternatives. The alternatives were selected based on specific methodologies (analysis of characteristics of the case study and use of tools previously developed to aid decision‐making in UWC), a decision support model (UWC‐MODEL), and an expert system (UWC‐ES), presented in Silva and Souza (2017, 2018), and include the following: Collection and use of rainwater ( A 1 ): Construction of infrastructure for capture, transport, treatment, storage, and residential use of rainwater. Collection, treatment, and use of gray water ( A 2 ): Construction of infrastructure for the collection, treatment, storage, and residential use of gray water (effluent originating from domestic activities such as washing dishes, clothes, and bathing); Consumption regulation ( A 3 ): Application of regulatory policy on consumption, for example, limitation of daily water consumption per residential unit. Strengthening the water supply system operator ( A 4 ): This alternative includes actions such as training of human resources, investments in control and automation, implementation of management and quality programs, and others. Best management practices (BMPs) for water conservation ( A 5 ): These refer to the California (USA) Urban Water Conservation Memorandum of Understanding in which the signatory water providers agreed to develop and implement comprehensive conservation BMPs using sound economic criteria and design principles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation