Expert Stock Picker: The Wisdom of (Experts in) Crowds

Abstract

The phrase "the wisdom of crowds" suggests that good verdicts can be achieved by averaging the opinions and insights of large, diverse groups of people who possess varied types of information. Online user-generated content enables researchers to view the opinions of large numbers of users publicly. These opinions, in the form of reviews and votes, can be used to automatically generate remarkably accurate verdicts-collective estimations of future performance-about companies, products, and people on the Web to resolve very tough problems. The wealth and richness of user-generated content may enable firms and individuals to aggregate consumer-think for better business understanding. Our main contribution, here applied to user-generated stock pick votes from a widely used online financial newsletter, is a genetic algorithm approach that can be used to identify the appropriate vote weights for users based on their prior individual voting success. Our method allows us to identify and rank "experts" within the crowd, enabling better stock pick decisions than the S&P 500. We show that the online crowd performs better, on average, than the S&P 500 for two test time periods, 2008 and 2009, in terms of both overall returns and risk-adjusted returns, as measured by the Sharpe ratio. Furthermore, we show that giving more weight to the votes of the experts in the crowds increases the accuracy of the verdicts, yielding an even greater return in the same time periods. We test our approach by utilizing more than three years of publicly available stock pick data. We compare our method to approaches derived from both the computer science and finance literature. We believe that our approach can be generalized to other domains where user opinions are publicly available early and where those opinions can be evaluated. For example, YouTube video ratings may be used to predict downloads, or online reviewer ratings on Digg may be used to predict the success or popularity of a story.Keywords data mining, prediction markets, social media, user-generated content, wisdom of crowds Expert Stock Picker: The Wisdom of (Experts in) Crowds Shawndra Hill and Noah Ready-CampbellABSTRACT: The phrase "the wisdom of crowds" suggests that good verdicts can be achieved by averaging the opinions and insights of large, diverse groups of people who possess varied types of information. Online user-generated content enables researchers to view the opinions of large numbers of users publicly. These opinions, in the form of reviews and votes, can be used to automatically generate remarkably accurate verdicts-collective estimations of future performance-about companies, products, and people on the Web to resolve very tough problems. The wealth and richness of user-generated content may enable firms and individuals to aggregate consumer-think for better business understanding. Our main contribution, here applied to user-generated stock pick votes from a widely used online financial newsletter, is a genetic algorithm approach that can be used to identif...

Does Monetary Incentive Lead to Better Stock Recommendations on Social Media?

“…More recently, Bollen et al (2011) show that Twitter sentiments can predict the stock market index in the short run. With the increasing popularity of social media, researchers also examine whether social media contents reflect the wisdom of crowds (e.g., Chen et al 2014, Hill and Ready-Campbell 2011, Nofer and Hinz 2014 in stock market predictions. Chen et al (2014) use articles and comments posted on Seeking Alpha and show that stock opinions on social media can predict the future performance of individual stocks in the long run.…”

Predicting wins and spread in the Premier League using a sentiment analysis of twitter

“…In sentiment analysis the focus is on analyzing direction-based text to determine tone (whether the author is positioning the text as objective/ factual or subjective/opinion-based) and polarity (whether the author's word choice is positive or negative) [18]. Sentiment analysis techniques have been well-studied in stock prediction [19,20] , online product sales [21] and corporate reputation [22]. One of the major findings was that negative sentiment was a better predictor of downward moves in firm value than were other sentimentbased techniques [23].…”

The Effect of Rating Scales on Decision Quality and User Attitudes in Online Innovation Communities

“…However, companies judge the quality of ideas not based on individual ratings. They are mostly interested in overall rankings of all rated objects to pick the most promising candidates [31] as these rankings attenuate individual decision, and non-systematic measurement errors [37]. We use this aggregated level of analysis to present the overall results from the experiment as well as sensitivity analyses using a Monte Carlo and bootstrap-based simulation to assess when and how stable, aggregated rankings can be constructed out of a pool of individual ratings.…”

“…While ratings of products, services, and online content serve as recommendations towards other users [14,17,37,49,60], ratings in the context of online innovation communities reflect a proxy measure of idea quality [62]. Online innovation communities invite external actors, in particular end-users, to freely reveal innovative ideas [78,83].…”