Expert opinions on good practice in evaluation of health promotion and primary prevention measures related to children and adolescents in Germany

Abstract

BackgroundDetermining what constitutes “good practice” in the measurement of the costs and effects of health promotion and disease prevention measures is of particular importance. The aim of this paper was to gather expert knowledge on (economic) evaluations of health promotion and prevention measures for children and adolescents, especially on the practical importance, the determinants of project success, meaningful parameters for evaluations, and supporting factors, but also on problems in their implementation. This information is targeted at people responsible for the development of primary prevention or health promotion programs.MethodsPartially structured open interviews were conducted by two interviewers and transcribed, paraphrased, and summarized for further use. Eight experts took part in the interviews.ResultsThe interviewed experts saw evaluation as a useful tool to establish the effects of prevention programs, to inform program improvement and further development, and to provide arguments to decision making. The respondents’ thought that determinants of a program’s success were effectiveness with evidence of causality, cost benefit relation, target-group reach and sustainability. It was considered important that hard and soft factors were included in an evaluation; costs were mentioned only by one expert. According to the experts, obstacles to evaluation were lacking resources, additional labor requirements, and the evaluators’ unfamiliarity with a program’s contents. It was recommended to consider evaluation design before a program is launched, to co-operate with people involved in a program and to make use of existing structures.ConclusionWhile in in this study only a partial view of expert knowledge is represented, it could show important points to consider when developing evaluations of prevention programs. By considering these points, researchers could further advance towards a more comprehensive approach of evaluation targeting measures in children and adolescents.

A qualitative study exploring young offenders’ perspectives on alcohol and other drug health promotion

“…First, while the need for universally targeted, settings-based health promotion work is important [ 22 ], our findings suggest that this approach within the AOD sector fails to reach some of the most disadvantaged and vulnerable young people. Universal approaches (while attractive to funding bodies and amenable to systemised and controlled evaluation) may not be well positioned to meet the unique needs of distinct population groups; population groups who must have a seat at the table in identifying health problems and how to respond to them [ 23 , 24 ]. We support a Freirian approach as described by Wallerstein and Bernstein [ 23 ] and recognise that ‘knowledge’ should emerge from community groups sharing experiences to understand the social influences that affect their health [ 23 ].…”

What are the essential components to implement individual-focused interventions for well-being and burnout in critical care healthcare professionals? A realist expert opinion

“…Each interview was also discussed (NA and DC) regarding its contribution to the Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configuration (CMOC). In the context of this study, the authors did not record non-verbal elements ( Korber and Becker, 2017 ). Preliminary codes were initially generated, and overarching themes were identified from these codes.…”

“…Expert opinions were evaluated using an interpretative evaluation strategy where notes recorded by authors during interviews were accumulated and re-checked with the recording in order not to lose information and avoid any corresponding distortion. The main statements by experts were checked independently by two authors (NA and DC) and respective notes ( Korber and Becker, 2017 ). Each interview was also discussed (NA and DC) regarding its contribution to the Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configuration (CMOC).…”

Understanding the needs of local youth to inform drug and alcohol prevention and harm reduction services: A qualitative study

“…Despite the implementation of a range of alcohol and other drug (AOD) prevention initiatives, 9 published literature has not consistently demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing actual substance use among program participants 10,11 . Some of the most effective AOD preventive programs have been successful because they first identified and then addressed the needs of the target population 12–14 . This suggests that formative research at the planning stage is important, when the goal is to learn as much as possible about how the target demographic thinks and behaves in relation to the issues being addressed 15 .…”