Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant

Abstract

Background Although general guidelines are available for established silicone gel breast implants, the unique characteristics of the latest Motiva implants warrant specific guidelines. Objectives This study aimed to generate consensus recommendations and summarize expert-based advice to better understand current surgical practices and to establish guidelines for surgeons transitioning from other implant devices to the Motiva implants. Methods A survey was compiled by 12 plastic surgeon experts in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery and 1 biotechnology scientist, and distributed to 36 plastic surgeons to establish a consensus on the use of these devices. Surgical techniques, complication rates, and implant selection were among the topics discussed. Results The experts agreed on 3 core principles regarding the use of Motiva Round and Ergonomix implants. Firstly, the dissected pocket needs to be close fitting and steps must be taken to prevent expansion of the pocket. Secondly, implant selection must be individualized. Finally, surgical planning and technique must be carefully considered. When questioned about problems they had ecountered, 84.6% of the experts agreed that they experienced fewer overall complications and 76.9% confirmed reduced capsular contracture rates with these devices. Overall, 84.6% of the experts favored selecting Motiva Ergonomix implants over Round implants to achieve a more natural look. In addition, 92.3% of the experts agreed that Motiva implants, due to their innovative technology, reduce the risk of anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Conclusions This international consensus of leading practitioners will assist plastic surgeons with patient selection, preoperative planning, and surgical technique. These recommendations are designed to optimize surgical outcomes, resulting in lower overall complication rates, more natural-looking breasts, and highly satisfied patients.

Response to “Clarification About ‘Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant’”

“…This note is intended to respond to and acknowledge our appreciation of our esteemed colleagues for their constructive letter 1 regarding our recent paper “Expert Consensus on the Use of a New Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth Surface Breast Implant.” 2…”

Hybrid Implant and Grafted Fat Breast Augmentation: Designing the Pathway to a Future With Breasts Free of Silicone Breast Implants

“…Thus, for highly volatile topics such as this, it may be necessary to review position papers or policy statements more frequently. 35 …”

History of breast implants: Back to the future

“…Despite a smooth outer surface according to ISO-14607:2018, 98 they present peculiar biomimetic topography, different from previous smooth implants, 99 , 100 which aims at reducing bacterial growth and inflammatory response compared to macrotextured devices, all the while minimizing host response. 101 , 102 Other innovative features of new generation devices include the ergonomic and rheological filler gels which change shape and projection according to the position, 103 or advanced multilayered elastomer shells to minimize silicone diffusion. 104…”