Expert assessments of the cost of light water small modular reactors

Abstract

Analysts and decision makers frequently want estimates of the cost of technologies that have yet to be developed or deployed. Small modular reactors (SMRs), which could become part of a portfolio of carbon-free energy sources, are one such technology. Existing estimates of likely SMR costs rely on problematic topdown approaches or bottom-up assessments that are proprietary. When done properly, expert elicitations can complement these approaches. We developed detailed technical descriptions of two SMR designs and then conduced elicitation interviews in which we obtained probabilistic judgments from 16 experts who are involved in, or have access to, engineering-economic assessments of SMR projects. Here, we report estimates of the overnight cost and construction duration for five reactor-deployment scenarios that involve a large reactor and two light water SMRs. Consistent with the uncertainty introduced by past cost overruns and construction delays, median estimates of the cost of new large plants vary by more than a factor of 2.5. Expert judgments about likely SMR costs display an even wider range. Median estimates for a 45 megawattselectric (MW e ) SMR range from $4,000 to $16,300/kW e and from $3,200 to $7,100/kW e for a 225-MW e SMR. Sources of disagreement are highlighted, exposing the thought processes of experts involved with SMR design. There was consensus that SMRs could be built and brought online about 2 y faster than large reactors. Experts identify more affordable unit cost, factory fabrication, and shorter construction schedules as factors that may make light water SMRs economically viable.nuclear power economics | technology assessment

Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy

“…Several studies have explored issues such as the health impacts of fine particle air pollution (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) and of lead pollution (13), the likely nature and extent of climate change (14)(15)(16), the various impacts that may result from climate change (17,18), herbicide-tolerant oilseed crops (19), and the likely cost and performance of various energy technologies (20)(21)(22)(23)(24). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has begun to make use of elicitation methods to address uncertain issues in environmental science (25), and those who work in both the Department of Energy and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have expressed interest in possibly using the method.…”

Induced seismicity hazard and risk by enhanced geothermal systems: an expert elicitation approach

“…We apply an elicitation technique [26,32] to evaluate EGS induced seismicity hazard and risk and characterize uncertainty, using individual judgements from knowledgeable experts. We aim to provide independently-standing hazard and risk estimates and highlight expert agreements and disagreements.…”

Energy Technology Expert Elicitations for Policy: Workshops, Modeling, and Meta-Analysis

“…test different input assumptions, the benefits associated with RD&D investments under more optimistic or more pessimistic experts' assumptions were estimated. 11 Anadon et al (2013) conducted a meta-analysis of three recent nuclear expert elicitations (Abdulla, Azevedo, & Morgan, 2013;Anadon et al, 2012) given the scarcity of information regarding the impact of expert selection and elicitation design on elicitation results. Metaanalysis is a set of statistical techniques used to reconcile and aggregate the results of multiple studies testing similar hypotheses and to thus enhance the overall reliability of findings (Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, & Rothstein, 2009;Glass, 1976).…”