2018
DOI: 10.1002/jum.14627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expert Agreement in the Interpretation of Lung Ultrasound Studies Performed on Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Abstract: The frequency of agreement was lower than might have been expected in this study. Several potential reasons are identified, chief among them the fact that ICU patients often develop multiple pulmonary insults, making agreement on a specific primary diagnosis challenging. This finding suggests that the utility of lung US in identifying the main contributing lung condition in ICU patients may be lower than in dyspneic patients encountered in the emergency department. It also raises the possibility that the clini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous investigations have demonstrated moderate to substantial agreement for B-lines [22][23][24][25] . In contrast, there is only moderate to fair agreement for consolidation 11,12,22 , pleural irregularity 22 , and effusions. 11,22 Others have shown that there is substantial interrater reliability for LUS across differing probes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Previous investigations have demonstrated moderate to substantial agreement for B-lines [22][23][24][25] . In contrast, there is only moderate to fair agreement for consolidation 11,12,22 , pleural irregularity 22 , and effusions. 11,22 Others have shown that there is substantial interrater reliability for LUS across differing probes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast, there is only moderate to fair agreement for consolidation 11,12,22 , pleural irregularity 22 , and effusions. 11,22 Others have shown that there is substantial interrater reliability for LUS across differing probes (e.g. linear vs. phased array) 25,26 , which is important given different portable devices were used in this investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5 While an accompanying thick pleural line is helpful in differentiating cardiogenic from non-cardiogenic causes of B lines, 6 reliable methods to differentiate non-cardiogenic causes from one another on LUS have not been established. Additionally, user dependent interpretation of LUS contributes to wide variation in disease classification, 7,8 creating urgency for techniques that improve diagnostic precision and reducing user-dependence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%