2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-015-1904-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments on the effect of laminar–turbulent transition on the SWBLI in H2K at Mach 6

Abstract: than two and an increase in the heat flux by a factor of more than four. Therefore, big areas of laminar flow are desirable to increase the performance of a propelled vehicle and to reduce the weight of the necessary thermal protection systems of a propelled or re-entry vehicle. On the other hand, turbulent boundary layers have a lower tendency to separate and are preferred in regions of large pressure gradients. Hence, the correct prediction of the transition is essential for the design of future hypersonic v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11e). This is consistent with the measurements of free transition on a §at panel at 0 degree angle of attack as shown in [13].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…11e). This is consistent with the measurements of free transition on a §at panel at 0 degree angle of attack as shown in [13].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The sensitivity of the transition process to the free-stream disturbances is greatly reduced as the shock incidence angle increases, in which case an absolute instability engendered in the separation bubble dominates the transition process (Hildebrand et al 2018). Experiments at shock incidence angles higher than the ones considered in Sandham et al (2014), Schülein (2014) and Willems et al (2015) have been recently addressed by Currao et al (2020) in an experimental investigation performed concurrently with the present study. They studied the interaction between a Mach-5.8 laminar hypersonic boundary layer and a shock generated by a 10 • wedge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements with PCB and ALTP sensors also have a high degree of uncertainty, due to the difficulty of calibration and the unknown mechanical oscillation properties of the transducer, but it is possible to detect periods of high fluctuations compared with less noisy times, allowing a measure of intermittency to be extracted. More results from the H2K unsteady signals, including a wavelet analysis, are presented in Willems & Guelhan (2014) PCB sensors and S q for ALTP heat flux sensors) was used to separate laminar from turbulent regions. Figure 13 shows the resulting intermittency distributions for cases (a) without a shock and (b) with shock impingement at two locations.…”
Section: −2mentioning
confidence: 99%