2005
DOI: 10.13182/fst05-a603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments on the AMBAL-M Central Solenoid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this model, the total drop in the ambipolar potential between the center of the device and the end wall is eU w = 5T and the particle flux through the mirror is q = q e = q i = 1.53•n 0 •(T /2πm i ) 1/2 . The energy flux through the mirror is evaluated as 19 • q e • T e ) = 7.89 • q • T . Given the trapped neutral beam power we applied this model to evaluate the electron temperature in the GDT experiment.…”
Section: Bulk Plasma Energy and Particle Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this model, the total drop in the ambipolar potential between the center of the device and the end wall is eU w = 5T and the particle flux through the mirror is q = q e = q i = 1.53•n 0 •(T /2πm i ) 1/2 . The energy flux through the mirror is evaluated as 19 • q e • T e ) = 7.89 • q • T . Given the trapped neutral beam power we applied this model to evaluate the electron temperature in the GDT experiment.…”
Section: Bulk Plasma Energy and Particle Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notable examples are the Phaedrus experiment at the University of Wisconsin, USA, which achieved 30% plasma beta using ponderomotive RF stabilization [18] and the AMBAL-U experiment in Novosibirsk in which 30% beta was also achieved with partial line tying to the gas-discharge plasma inside a gun placed at the end wall [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%