2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-0182(00)00174-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments in waterlogging and sedimentology of charcoal: results and implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
86
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
7
86
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In water, after a short period of bedload transport, charred fragments break down into relatively resistent, somewhat rounded pieces, and thereafter remain stable. They exhibit the same behaviour as fragments of highly vesiculated pumice, which initially floats and sinks as it becomes waterlogged (Nichols, 2000). The small charcoal particles may sink in a matter of hours, but the larger ones may float for months or years before becoming waterlogged and sinking.…”
Section: Microcharcoal Production and Depositionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In water, after a short period of bedload transport, charred fragments break down into relatively resistent, somewhat rounded pieces, and thereafter remain stable. They exhibit the same behaviour as fragments of highly vesiculated pumice, which initially floats and sinks as it becomes waterlogged (Nichols, 2000). The small charcoal particles may sink in a matter of hours, but the larger ones may float for months or years before becoming waterlogged and sinking.…”
Section: Microcharcoal Production and Depositionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Fresh charcoal has a bulk density less than that of water and so initially floats (33) but with continued immersion becomes waterlogged and sinks. The time taken for a variety of charred remains to become waterlogged and sink ranges between 24 and 288 h (33). This is of a similar order of magnitude to the time taken for the K-T ejecta material to settle in a freshwater environment, further confirming that there is no taphonomic reason that charcoal should not have been incorporated into the K-T BIRs as both the charcoal and ejecta should have been deposited at the bottom of the ponds and/or mires at similar times.…”
Section: Summary Of Evidence Of K-t Conflagrations Versus Combustion Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although tumbling experiments may not ideally imitate the hydrodynamic conditions in the natural environments (e.g., Kuenen 1966a, b;Nichols et al 2000), it is worth emphasizing that the pattern of shell fragmentation and abrasion is similar to that found in natural habitats (e.g., Pilkey et al 1967;Cadée 2016;Leighton et al 2016). It should also be pointed out that due to the large variety of macro-and micro-morphological features of mollusc shells, extrapolation of results of the present study to all molluscs should be undertaken with some caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%