1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4563(199602)13:2<53::aid-rob1>3.0.co;2-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments in contact control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impedance control [10], [13] aims at controlling position and force by establishing desired contact dynamics while the force control [19] commands the system to track a force set-point directly. For this work we adopted a class of nonlinear controller presented by our collaborator H. Seraji [20], [21], [22]. When the system detects contact with the fingertip, it switches to force control as depicted in Figure 8.…”
Section: Contact Force Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impedance control [10], [13] aims at controlling position and force by establishing desired contact dynamics while the force control [19] commands the system to track a force set-point directly. For this work we adopted a class of nonlinear controller presented by our collaborator H. Seraji [20], [21], [22]. When the system detects contact with the fingertip, it switches to force control as depicted in Figure 8.…”
Section: Contact Force Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose that the robot impacts the environmental surface with a nonzero approaching velocity at time , the system kinetic energy at any time is governed by (5) where is the initial kinetic energy, and , , and are the actuating work, the work done by the reaction force, and the kinetic energy at time , respectively. They are determined by (6) Assuming is constant and the initial velocity vanishes at point at time , and substituting (4) and (6) into (5) yield when (7) in which is the potential energy possessed by the environment, is the energy dissipated by the environment, and is the energy consumed by the velocity feedback. It is obvious that the velocity feedback plays a role similar to the damping factor , in terms of dissipation of the initial kinetic energy generated by the nonzero impact speed.…”
Section: A Contact Transition Control Incorporating Only Velocity Fementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hogan [5] implemented impedance control in experiments involving contact transitions and achieved stability against a stiff environment, while Vossoughi and Donath [6] employed impedance methods for environments with varying stiffnesses. Serajia et al [7], [8] integrated hybrid position/force control with impedance control for employing force feedback to enable the robot to achieve a desired contact force. Youcef-Toumi and Guts [9] developed a dimensionless representation of impact behavior and used integral force compensation with velocity feedback to improve impact response, while Khatib and Burdick [10] presented a method for dissipating impact oscillations by increasing the velocity gains of a proportional-derivative force controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hogan [5] implemented impedance control in experiments involving contact transitions and achieved stability against a stiff environment, while Vossoughi and Donath [6] employed impedance methods for environments with varying stiffnesses. Serajia and Collaugh [7], [8] integrated the hybrid position/force control and impedance control for employing force feedback to enable the robot to achieve a desired contact force. Youcef-Toumi and Guts [9] developed a dimensionless representation of impact behavior and used integral force compensation with velocity feedback to improve impact response, while Khatib and Burdick [10] presented a method for dissipating impact oscillations by increasing the velocity gains of a proportional-derivative force controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%