1996
DOI: 10.2514/3.46914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments and analysis for a gust generator in a wind tunnel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(9) In this study we have used freeplay, δ = 2.12°, so that the nominal angular gap shown in Fig. (9) In this study we have used freeplay, δ = 2.12°, so that the nominal angular gap shown in Fig.…”
Section: Control Surface Nonlinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(9) In this study we have used freeplay, δ = 2.12°, so that the nominal angular gap shown in Fig. (9) In this study we have used freeplay, δ = 2.12°, so that the nominal angular gap shown in Fig.…”
Section: Control Surface Nonlinearitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are investigations with gust excitation in a wind tunnel in the low subsonic flight regime, for instance tests with the European Research Aeroelastic Model [6,7], and experiments at Duke University based on rotating slotted cylinders [8]. A gust generator using oscillating vanes mounted upstream of the wind tunnel test section was also developed in the NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two foils are some distance apart and the useful flow perturbations are generated downstream of the foils in the horizontal plane of symmetry of the foil set-up. This approach was pioneered by Ham et al (1974) and has later also been used by Jancauskas & Melbourne (1980), Tang et al (1996), Passmore et al (2001), Delpero (1992) and Horwich (1993). In these pieces of work, only either longitudinal or vertical perturbations were generated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%