2020
DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics5010002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experiments and Agent Based Models of Zooplankton Movement within Complex Flow Environments

Abstract: The movement of plankton is often dictated by local flow patterns, particularly during storms and in environments with strong flows. Reefs, macrophyte beds, and other immersed structures can provide shelter against washout and drastically alter the distributions of plankton as these structures redirect and slow the flows through them. Advection–diffusion and agent-based models are often used to describe the movement of plankton within marine and fresh water environments and across multiple scales. Experimental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining multiple modeling approaches in a more comprehensive model can generate novel insights and identify emergent properties in the system under study. Indeed, CFD and ABM have been used together in several diverse multiscale models that simulate disaster responses (Epstein et al, 2011), cell and particle migration through blood vessels (Fullstone et al, 2015;Bhui and Hayenga, 2017;Bhui, 2018;Corti et al, 2020), and movement of zooplankton in complex flow environments (Ozalp et al, 2020). Notably, CFD and ABM per se have never been used together to understand the process dynamics within a bioreactor relevant to cultivated meat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining multiple modeling approaches in a more comprehensive model can generate novel insights and identify emergent properties in the system under study. Indeed, CFD and ABM have been used together in several diverse multiscale models that simulate disaster responses (Epstein et al, 2011), cell and particle migration through blood vessels (Fullstone et al, 2015;Bhui and Hayenga, 2017;Bhui, 2018;Corti et al, 2020), and movement of zooplankton in complex flow environments (Ozalp et al, 2020). Notably, CFD and ABM per se have never been used together to understand the process dynamics within a bioreactor relevant to cultivated meat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining multiple modeling approaches in a more comprehensive model can generate novel insights and identify emergent properties in the system under study. Indeed, CFD and ABM have been used together in several diverse multiscale models that simulate disaster responses [32], cell and particle migration through blood vessels [33][34][35][36], and movement of zooplankton in complex flow environments [37]. Notably, CFD and ABM per se have never been used together to understand the process dynamics within a bioreactor relevant to cultivated meat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the most common methods to investigate the hydrodynamic characteristics of artificial reefs relate to numerical simulations or experimental tests conducted within wind tunnel or flumes, where particle image velocimetry (PIV) techniques can be applied [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Previous studies conducted by adopting these methods have highlighted a list of factors that can alter the hydrodynamic characteristics of artificial reefs, and this includes the original flow field and the existing terrain, the location of the new artificial reefs placed, the manufacturing materials, the shape and the structure, the opening ratio and the upstream area of the reefs, as well as the number of elements [32][33][34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%