2016
DOI: 10.18520/cs/v111/i7/1152-1155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimenting with the Teaching of Organic Chemistry - the Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Way

Abstract: Undergraduate students tend to find organic chemistry rather challenging and we as teachers of the subject are constantly trying to find new ways to enthuse students and help them understand and enjoy the subject. Active learning has taken centre stage today and one such student-centric teaching strategy, process-oriented guided inquiry learning has been explored by us. In this article we present our experience, the advantages of this teaching methodology and the likely challenges in implementation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(2016) This year, organic chemistry was taught using the problem-solving scaffold (Bodé & Flynn, 2016;Sloop et al, 2016) and analogy approaches, especially in the abstract matter (Samara, 2016). Furthermore, the process-oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) (Carneiro et al, 2016), Topic-Specific Pedagogy Content Knowledge (TSPCK) and Content Knowledge (CK) (Davidowitz & Potgieter, 2016) methods were implemented, with various chemistry software such as Chem Office, Hyperchem, and Gaussian 03, used to improve student spatial thinking skills (Wang, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2016) This year, organic chemistry was taught using the problem-solving scaffold (Bodé & Flynn, 2016;Sloop et al, 2016) and analogy approaches, especially in the abstract matter (Samara, 2016). Furthermore, the process-oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) (Carneiro et al, 2016), Topic-Specific Pedagogy Content Knowledge (TSPCK) and Content Knowledge (CK) (Davidowitz & Potgieter, 2016) methods were implemented, with various chemistry software such as Chem Office, Hyperchem, and Gaussian 03, used to improve student spatial thinking skills (Wang, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lecturers also tried to improve their course quality using the Topic-Specific Pedagogy Content Knowledge (TSPCK), Content Knowledge (CK) (Davidowitz & Potgieter, 2016), and process-oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) (Carneiro et al, 2016). Therefore, they provided an alternative method for students in a group activity to enjoy learning organic chemistry by using the card game and puzzles (Bell et al, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model pembelajaran guided-inquiry perlu digunakan dalam proses pembelajaran untuk membuat siswa aktif dalam kegiatan pembelajaran sehingga siswa dapat terlibat dalam proses pemikiran yang mendalam yang akan membantu untuk memecahkan masalah yang terjadi dalam belajar mandiri (Carneiro et al, 2016). Proses pembelajaran model ini juga menuntun siswa bekerja dalam kelompok kecil (Vanags et al, 2013) sehingga setiap anggota kelompok secara aktif menyelesaikan tugasnya masing-masing untuk saling membantu dalam memecahkan masalah bersama.…”
Section: Pembahasanunclassified
“…Kegiatan berbasis penyelidikan bersifat induktif, memiliki hasil yang tidak ditentukan, dan mengharuskan siswa untuk membuat prosedur mereka sendiri (MacKay & Wetzel, 2014); (Douglas & Chiu, 2012). Siswa lebih banyak terlibat (Carneiro, Parulekar, Shridhar, & Ladage, 2016), mengandung lebih sedikit arahan, dan memberi siswa lebih banyak tanggung jawab untuk menentukan pilihan prosedural daripada format tradisional (Douglas & Chiu, 2012). Pendekatan ini secara efektif memberikan kepemilikan siswa atas kegiatan laboratorium yang menghasilkan siswa menunjukkan peningkatan sikap terhadap instruksi ilmu pengetahuan (Conway, 2014).…”
unclassified