2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119417989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimentation, Validation, and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
273
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 417 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
273
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A standard propagation of uncertainty argument [Coleman and Steele, 2009] leads to the following expression for estimating the band of variability in minimum crack lifetime estimates (detailed in Appendix F):…”
Section: Model Results Variability Due To Rock and Environment Variabimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A standard propagation of uncertainty argument [Coleman and Steele, 2009] leads to the following expression for estimating the band of variability in minimum crack lifetime estimates (detailed in Appendix F):…”
Section: Model Results Variability Due To Rock and Environment Variabimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, we adapt a standard propagation of uncertainty argument [Coleman and Steele, 2009] to the task of estimating the random relative variability, δr/r, in the derived or modeled quantity, r. Crucially, extending the propagation of uncertainty argument to the estimation of the random relative variability, δr/r, is permissible since the broad, nonrestrictive statistical assumptions, and the mathematical steps [Coleman and Steele, 2009] used in the propagation of uncertainty argument-which leads to equation (F2) below-hold and can be applied here.…”
Section: F2 Derivation Of Estimated Relative Variability δR/rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An uncertainty analysis is conducted to determine the maximum errors of the direct and the indirect measurement data. 22 The uncertainties of the experimental data are calculated and shown in Table 4. The uncertainty of direct measurement data can be obtained from Equation (12…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hour) in the observed records and comparing the missing records to the confidence interval range. The confidence interval for each hourly record was estimated by (a) sub-setting the entire dataset for each given hour (e.g., selecting the records from all years for 1 Jan. 01:00), (b) calculating the mean and the standard error at 95% confidence level for the subset, and (c) calculating the lower and upper limit of the confidence interval by subtracting and adding the standard error to the mean, respectively (Helsel and Hirsch, 2002;Coleman and Steele, 2018). For precipitation, the downscaled dataset was assessed using observed hourly precipitation from the closest station (i.e.…”
Section: Gap-fillingmentioning
confidence: 99%