2023
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c12095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimentally Validated Ab Initio Crystal Structure Prediction of Novel Metal–Organic Framework Materials

Abstract: First-principles crystal structure prediction (CSP) is the most powerful approach for materials discovery, enabling the prediction and evaluation of properties of new solid phases based only on a diagram of their underlying components. Here, we present the first CSP-based discovery of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), offering a broader alternative to conventional techniques, which rely on geometry, intuition, and experimental screening. Phase landscapes were calculated for three systems involving flexible Cu­(… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy densities ( E g ) of 1 and 2 are 27.97 and 25.90 kJ g −1 , respectively, and the volumetric energy densities ( E v ) of 1 and 2 are 42.91 and 41.98 kJ cm −3 , respectively. Compounds 1 and 2 occupy extraordinary energy densities (Table 1), which are not only higher than those of the reported CBA-CuAg (28.26 kJ cm −3 ), 1 CuBTA-1 (20.64 kJ cm −3 ), 26 QTZ-Zn(EtIm) 2 (37.20 kJ cm −3 ), 27 ANA-Zn(BuIm) 2 (36.30 kJ cm −3 ), 27 Cd(2-VIM) 2 (15.80 kJ cm −3 ), 32 Zn(2-VIM) 2 (18.90 kJ cm −3 ), 32 Co(2-VIM) 2 (18.40 kJ cm −3 ) 32 and Cu(2-VIM) 2 (34.10 kJ cm −3 ), 33 but also greater than that of the traditional explosive TNT (24.81 kJ cm −3 ). 38 The excellent energy densities of 1 and 2 can be attributed to the high energy N(CN) 2 − anions leading to the metal imidazolate frameworks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The energy densities ( E g ) of 1 and 2 are 27.97 and 25.90 kJ g −1 , respectively, and the volumetric energy densities ( E v ) of 1 and 2 are 42.91 and 41.98 kJ cm −3 , respectively. Compounds 1 and 2 occupy extraordinary energy densities (Table 1), which are not only higher than those of the reported CBA-CuAg (28.26 kJ cm −3 ), 1 CuBTA-1 (20.64 kJ cm −3 ), 26 QTZ-Zn(EtIm) 2 (37.20 kJ cm −3 ), 27 ANA-Zn(BuIm) 2 (36.30 kJ cm −3 ), 27 Cd(2-VIM) 2 (15.80 kJ cm −3 ), 32 Zn(2-VIM) 2 (18.90 kJ cm −3 ), 32 Co(2-VIM) 2 (18.40 kJ cm −3 ) 32 and Cu(2-VIM) 2 (34.10 kJ cm −3 ), 33 but also greater than that of the traditional explosive TNT (24.81 kJ cm −3 ). 38 The excellent energy densities of 1 and 2 can be attributed to the high energy N(CN) 2 − anions leading to the metal imidazolate frameworks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, 1 and 2 exhibit excellent spontaneous combustion behaviours. Both of them display short ID times (ID ≤ 50 ms) 33 of 28(3) and 36(2) ms, respectively, and show steady flames after ignition (Fig. 3c and d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CSP has enabled the crystal structures of relatively large organic molecules, such as those used in the pharmaceutical industry, to be predicted with ever increasing degrees of accuracy. In recent years, the field of CSP has expanded from small organic molecules to complex metal–organic frameworks and supramolecular solids . However, significant challenges still remain. , First, the minimum-energy landscapes encountered in CSP frequently predict many structures of similar energy and density .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we present a complementary approach to assess ZIF stability, by investigating the stabilizing effect of metal substitution across a series of topologically similar frameworks. Rather than investigating the effect of linker substituents in isostructural ZIFs, we investigate the enthalpic contribution of metal substitution on topologically similar ZIFs, namely, SOD-Co­(MeIm) 2 , SOD-Zn­(MeIm) 2 , dia -Co­(MeIm) 2 , dia -Cu­(MeIm) 2 , and dia -Zn­(MeIm) 2 (Figure ). This allows the direct assessment of the thermodynamic stability of these ZIFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%