2016
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arw144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimentally provided conspecific cues boost bird territory density but not breeding performance

Abstract: Decision-making during different life-history stages requires information, which is obtained through own or others' experience and interaction with the environment. In birds, song is important for territory defense and mate attraction. Although song has evolved to purposely convey information, it can be inadvertently exploited by conspecifics. Experiments attempting to attract focal species by playing back their song are numerous, yet the consequences for reproductive performance remain little understood. In 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also did not actively assess nesting success of the Willow Flycatchers that colonized our meadows, and, indeed, few other studies have attempted to address breeding success in relation to conspecific broadcasts (Ahlering et al 2010, Andrews et al 2015, Grendelmeier et al 2017). Attraction to conspecifics likely helps to improve survival by minimizing the time birds need to search for new territory and increasing opportunities for individuals to find mates (Fletcher 2006), but artificially provided conspecific broadcasts has not explicitly been shown to improve survival of reproductive success (Ahlering et al 2010, Grendelmeier et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also did not actively assess nesting success of the Willow Flycatchers that colonized our meadows, and, indeed, few other studies have attempted to address breeding success in relation to conspecific broadcasts (Ahlering et al 2010, Andrews et al 2015, Grendelmeier et al 2017). Attraction to conspecifics likely helps to improve survival by minimizing the time birds need to search for new territory and increasing opportunities for individuals to find mates (Fletcher 2006), but artificially provided conspecific broadcasts has not explicitly been shown to improve survival of reproductive success (Ahlering et al 2010, Grendelmeier et al 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attraction to conspecifics likely helps to improve survival by minimizing the time birds need to search for new territory and increasing opportunities for individuals to find mates (Fletcher 2006), but artificially provided conspecific broadcasts has not explicitly been shown to improve survival of reproductive success (Ahlering et al 2010, Grendelmeier et al 2017. Because most prospecting Willow Flycatchers seeking to establish new territories are second-year individuals and typically less productive than their older counterparts (Sedgwick 2004, Paxton et al 2007), we would not necessarily expect to see high productivity in the short term from individuals attracted to a habitat by conspecific broadcasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to state forestry agencies in Germany and Switzerland, the seed crop of beech and oak trees in 2014 was average, even though rodent abundance in 2015, based on similar track plate data from northern Switzerland (Grendelmeier et al, 2017) and own observations, was rather high. Hence, the effect of simulating increased rodent presence might have been weakened.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…, Grendelmeier et al . ). Larger areas of suitable habitat give more chances for clustering to occur than smaller areas, making social constraints a likely explanation for area sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, Grendelmeier et al . ). Wood Warblers have been found to be positively associated with structurally homogeneous forests of intermediate age, closed canopy, low canopy height diversity and absence of shrubs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%