2019
DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2019.1688171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimentally manipulating social media abstinence: results of a four-week diary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, of the eight aggregate usage experiments described in one exhaustive open-source review compiled by scholars on both sides of the social media/well-being debate (J. Haidt and J. Twenge, unpublished), six revealed a negative effect of aggregate social media use on some [27][28][29] or all [30][31][32] of the well-being measures they administered (although 37's effects were specific to Instagram, not Facebook). By contrast, one experiment revealed mixed positive and negative results [33] and another null [34] findings.…”
Section: Box 1 the Jingle-jangle Problemmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For example, of the eight aggregate usage experiments described in one exhaustive open-source review compiled by scholars on both sides of the social media/well-being debate (J. Haidt and J. Twenge, unpublished), six revealed a negative effect of aggregate social media use on some [27][28][29] or all [30][31][32] of the well-being measures they administered (although 37's effects were specific to Instagram, not Facebook). By contrast, one experiment revealed mixed positive and negative results [33] and another null [34] findings.…”
Section: Box 1 the Jingle-jangle Problemmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Similar to previous studies, there was not an objective measure of SNS usage. Hall et al (2019) found no significant effects of quitting SNS for one to four weeks, and Hanley et al (2019) found that a one week vacation from Facebook and Instagram had no significant effect on passive users and resulted in a lower positive affect for active users. Hall et al (2019) measured compliance by checking participants' activity on their social media platforms, although this method cannot detect passive usage, and Hanley et al (2019) measured usage amount through Res-cueTime software, demonstrating an increased focus in the field on objective measures of SNS use.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The findings from this study help to clarify past research and paves the way for future analysis of the benefits and drawbacks to quitting social media. Importantly, the majority of participants in this study had been social media free for a year or more, allowing for a broader understanding of the implications related to social media nonuse compared to past work, which often experimentally had participants quit for a week to a month (e.g., Hall et al, 2019;Hanley et al, 2019;Tromholt, 2016). Similarly, most past work focused on just quitting a single site rather than all social media; it can be much easier to walk away from one site when there is an alternative option (e.g., leaving Facebook for Instagram).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of this equation assumes there are benefits to quitting: research from Hall, Xing, Ross, and Johnson (2019) found there to be no difference in well-being between those who quit social media over the course of a month and those who maintained use. Similarly, Hanley, Watt, and Coventry (2019) assessed taking a one-week break from social media and did not find any significant shift in life satisfaction of those who took a break, suggesting it may be a short term and minimal effect, if any, on well-being.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%