2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3079517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimentally identifying masked sources applying time reversal with the selective source reduction method

Abstract: This paper describes a time reversal (TR) method of spatially illuminating a source signal which has been masked by another source signal. This masking occurs as a result of inherent limitations in the traditional TR process. The selective source reduction (SSR) method employs a subtraction technique where one TR focus is selectively reduced to illuminate the masked focus. Experimental results and considerations are presented to demonstrate the SSR method for two elastic wave pulses emitted simultaneously from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Backprojection images do not yield actual slip distributions or moment estimates because they do not quantitatively account for the Green's function influences on seismic wave energy partitioning, but they can provide overall characterization of source finiteness that may influence parameterization of finite-source modeling. There are some similarities with time-reversal imaging approaches (e.g., Larmat et al, 2006;Kawakatsu and Montagner, 2008;Anderson et al, 2009), but P wave back projections assume simple optical travel time effects and do not account for propagation losses. S wave back projections are not attempted due to the large path travel time anomalies that create difficulty in phase alignment.…”
Section: Back-projection Images Of the Source Rupture Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Backprojection images do not yield actual slip distributions or moment estimates because they do not quantitatively account for the Green's function influences on seismic wave energy partitioning, but they can provide overall characterization of source finiteness that may influence parameterization of finite-source modeling. There are some similarities with time-reversal imaging approaches (e.g., Larmat et al, 2006;Kawakatsu and Montagner, 2008;Anderson et al, 2009), but P wave back projections assume simple optical travel time effects and do not account for propagation losses. S wave back projections are not attempted due to the large path travel time anomalies that create difficulty in phase alignment.…”
Section: Back-projection Images Of the Source Rupture Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selective focusing is achieved by the decomposition of the TR operator and requires an array of transmitting-receiving transducers. Another procedure is suggested by Anderson et al [31] and is adopted in the method presented. Fig.…”
Section: Unveiling Small Scatterersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dealing with several sources, we propose to use an automatic iterative process, inspired by recent works. 38,39 The main idea consists in automatically defining as many sinks as real sources exist in the volume delimited by the hemispherical array. Hence, it is necessary to a priori know the number of sources which are radiating to identify their position.…”
Section: E Synthetic Trs: a Step Toward Perfect Tr Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%