2021
DOI: 10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2021.53.6.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Work for Bar Straightness Effect Evaluation of Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar

Abstract: Bar straightness is one of several factors that can affect the quality of the strain wave signal in a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB). Recently, it was found that the bar components of the SHPB at the Lightweight Structures Laboratory displayed a deviation in straightness because of manufacturing limitations. An evaluation was needed to determine whether the strain wave signals produced from this SHPB are acceptable or not. A numerical model was developed to investigate this effect. In this paper, experime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the remaining compression pulse will be transmitted to the specimen and deforms it before transmitted to the transmitter bar. This transmitted pulse then will also be recorded by the strain gauge when reaching the middle of the transmitter bar [30]. Typical pulses produced by SHPB testing are shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: High Strain Rate Test Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (Shpb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the remaining compression pulse will be transmitted to the specimen and deforms it before transmitted to the transmitter bar. This transmitted pulse then will also be recorded by the strain gauge when reaching the middle of the transmitter bar [30]. Typical pulses produced by SHPB testing are shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: High Strain Rate Test Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (Shpb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been utilized by Vedantam et al (2005). Others (Afdhal et al (2014); Afdhal et al (2016); Leonardo et al (2013)) have determined it by curve fitting. Here we are finding the constant A by plotting the graph of the ln(strain rate ) vs Yield stress and finding out the Y intercept of the linear fit.…”
Section: Determination Of Constant a And The Selection Of The Strain ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have not got a unified model but modelled, each curve individually using the power law model. Afdhal et al (2016) 2 Experimental Method…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%