2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental water injection into lungs using an animal model: Verification of the diatom concentration test to diagnose drowning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies reported drowning probabilities of 96% for L/D values >1 and even 100% for L/D values >2, while yet evincing limited conclusiveness between drowning and post-mortal immersion at values ≤1 [ 8 ]. Investigation of the cases 1–3, which all presented distinct classical drowning signs [ 23 , 24 ], achieved L/D values between 2.4 and 10.9, which therefore can be considered strong evidence for drowning [ 25 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported drowning probabilities of 96% for L/D values >1 and even 100% for L/D values >2, while yet evincing limited conclusiveness between drowning and post-mortal immersion at values ≤1 [ 8 ]. Investigation of the cases 1–3, which all presented distinct classical drowning signs [ 23 , 24 ], achieved L/D values between 2.4 and 10.9, which therefore can be considered strong evidence for drowning [ 25 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on larger samples are needed to further investigate the hypothesis that a consumption of alcohol and/or drugs may affect diatom analyses, and to further explore the association observed between the toxicological status and lung weight in fatal drownings. Future research should better take into account medical history as well as the diatom concentration in the drowning environment, as the ratio of diatom concentration in the organs to diatom concentration in water might be a marker of interest [ 15 , 26 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%