2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental vs. simulation analysis of LoRa for vehicular communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many articles focus on experimental and simulation comparison [16][17][18], proving that experiment and simulation are consistent. The sameness is the primary requirement in the simulation, where any difference may cause fatal results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Many articles focus on experimental and simulation comparison [16][17][18], proving that experiment and simulation are consistent. The sameness is the primary requirement in the simulation, where any difference may cause fatal results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Though this debate still rages, several researchers have shown that simulation results are often at par with real-world tests. For instance, using LoRa, the authors in [20] compared simulation results with real world test for intervehicle communication. They used NS3 as a simulation platform and an Arduino UNO + Dragino LoRa module for the real-world tests, while Propagation loss, coverage Packet Inter-reception (PIR), Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR) and Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) level were used as benchmark metrics.…”
Section: ) Wireless Communication Network For Water Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar work, Hassan [21] also compared the efficacy of simulation results (from Radio Mobile simulator) with real-world tests (using micro controllers + LoRa modules) when using LoRa as a bridge for Wi-Fi. Unlike [20], [21] did not give a side-byside comparison of simulated vs. real-world results for each metric considered but concluded that the simulator performed well. [22] set up seven pairs of XBee modules and compared communication performance using both the 800/900MHz and 2.4GHz frequencies.…”
Section: ) Wireless Communication Network For Water Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been provided to understand the technical limits of LoRa technology. These works have focused on different layers of LoRa including the application layer [ 19 ], transport layer [ 20 ], network layer [ 21 ], data link layer [ 22 ] as well as the physical layer [ 23 ]. The first attempts started by investigating the secret of the LoRa modulation technique based on the Chirp Spreading Spectrum (CSS) scheme as reviewed in [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%