2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10156-009-0001-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental verification of the efficacy of optimized two-step infusion therapy with meropenem using an in vitro pharmacodynamic model and Monte Carlo simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, this approach is unfavorable for highly resistant bacterial isolates because it reduces the initial bactericidal effects due to both the decrease in meropenem peak concentration and the delay in its peak time, as demonstrated by Eguchi et al (2010). It is therefore difficult for meropenem to achieve the MIC of highly resistant bacterial isolates, even at a high dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, this approach is unfavorable for highly resistant bacterial isolates because it reduces the initial bactericidal effects due to both the decrease in meropenem peak concentration and the delay in its peak time, as demonstrated by Eguchi et al (2010). It is therefore difficult for meropenem to achieve the MIC of highly resistant bacterial isolates, even at a high dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite acquisition of target AUC 0−24 /MIC by OTSI method, we were unable to demonstrate a microbiological or clinical superiority of these recommended VAN OTSI regimens based on MCSs as little data are currently available, either in vivo or in vitro experiments. However, in a study of in vitro pharmacodynamic model and MCSs (Eguchi et al, 2010), experimental verification of the efficacy of optimized two-step infusion therapy (OTIT), for meropenem but not for VAN, was performed. Surprisingly, the in vitro bactericidal effect of the optimal meropenem OTIT regimens is consistent with the bactericidal effect predicted by their respective PTA of these regimens derived from MCSs, especially for Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates with meropenem MIC of ≤4 mg/L, which partly indicated the feasibility of MCSs method in predicting the efficacy of the regimens although the research object of this study was meropenem rather than VAN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delay of onset of antibacterial activity compared with intermittent administration can be circumvented by administration of an initial loading dose before continuous or prolonged infusion 54,57 .…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prolonged infusion allows 4 hours between each 8 hours dosing interval, when other agents could be administered through the same intravenous line. The duration of infusion (3-4 hours) approximates the duration of coverage of the dosing interval with free drug in excess of the MIC that provides the maximal microbiological effect [52][53][54] . According to the literature, the prolonged infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam resulted in cost savings by reducing the dosing frequency from every 6 hours to every 8 hours.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%