2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574711000014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental verification of soft-robot gaits evolved using a lumped dynamic model

Abstract: SUMMARYWhen generating gaits for soft robots (those with no explicit joints), it is not evident that undulating control schemes are the most efficient. In considering alternative control schemes, however, the computational costs of evaluating continuum mechanic models of soft robots represent a significant bottleneck. We consider the use of lumped dynamic models for soft robotic systems. Such models have not been employed previously to design gaits for soft robotic systems, though they are widely used to simul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar approaches, mostly focused on the evolution of neural control systems, are reported in [37] [38] [39]. Some robotics works have focused on evolving gaits for fixed soft robots [40]. Others have evolved control and stiffness properties for fixed morphologies embedding flexible elements [41] [42], which were in some cases experimentally validated.…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar approaches, mostly focused on the evolution of neural control systems, are reported in [37] [38] [39]. Some robotics works have focused on evolving gaits for fixed soft robots [40]. Others have evolved control and stiffness properties for fixed morphologies embedding flexible elements [41] [42], which were in some cases experimentally validated.…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 98%
“…There are previous literatures which have extensively studied the gripping and biomechanics of prolegs of different types of caterpillars. [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] The prolegs are essential for inching and crawling locomotion as described by Van Griethuijsen and Trimmer. 35 However, a coordination of proleg grip and re-lease with a wave-like muscle activity is required for forward or turning movement.…”
Section: Inherent Friction Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prohibitive computational cost of direct optimization on physical robots has led some researchers to envisage full optimization processes in simulation [53]. A first attempt to deal with the reality gap is to build more accurate simulation models.…”
Section: B Simulation-based Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%