Abstract:A positive bone scan in an experimental model of bilateral ulna diaphyseal bone grafts demonstrated early bone repair in both vascularized and nonvascularized orthotopic ulna autografts. A positive bone scan did not correlate with the perfusion of the vascularized and nonvascularized grafts as measured by microangiograms done 1 week postoperatively. In this model, if the bone scan is intended to monitor the circulatory status and viability of the bone graft, it must be done earlier than 1 week postoperative pr… Show more
“…Vascularized bone grafts (VBGs) are capable of achieving primary bony healing without creeping substitution and can, thus, hasten fracture healing, and, revascularize ischemic bone. 3,12,13 Other potential advantages are faster rates of incorporation, greater durability, and increased viability by increasing blood supply to nonunion site. Several methods of transferring a VBG to the scaphoid have been reported in the literature.…”
Scaphoid nonunion is a complex problem that may continue to exist despite conventional methods of bone grafting and internal fixation. Vascularized bone grafting has been proposed as a treatment option for scaphoid nonunions with or without avascular necrosis of the proximal pole. Zaidemberg and colleagues first introduced the dorsal distal radius graft that has gained considerable popularity in the past 2 decades. Less commonly, the 2,3 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicled vascularized bone graft has been used successfully with equally promising results. It has become the graft of our choice for the treatment of scaphoid nonunions as it has a longer pedicle and is able to provide a wider arc of rotation that allows easier reach of the volar carpus. The use of rigid internal fixation with screws also permitted early wrist range of motion and shorter periods of immobilization. In this article, we describe our surgical technique of harvesting the 2,3 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicled vascularized bone graft. The anatomy, indications, contraindications, and complications of treatment are also detailed.
“…Vascularized bone grafts (VBGs) are capable of achieving primary bony healing without creeping substitution and can, thus, hasten fracture healing, and, revascularize ischemic bone. 3,12,13 Other potential advantages are faster rates of incorporation, greater durability, and increased viability by increasing blood supply to nonunion site. Several methods of transferring a VBG to the scaphoid have been reported in the literature.…”
Scaphoid nonunion is a complex problem that may continue to exist despite conventional methods of bone grafting and internal fixation. Vascularized bone grafting has been proposed as a treatment option for scaphoid nonunions with or without avascular necrosis of the proximal pole. Zaidemberg and colleagues first introduced the dorsal distal radius graft that has gained considerable popularity in the past 2 decades. Less commonly, the 2,3 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicled vascularized bone graft has been used successfully with equally promising results. It has become the graft of our choice for the treatment of scaphoid nonunions as it has a longer pedicle and is able to provide a wider arc of rotation that allows easier reach of the volar carpus. The use of rigid internal fixation with screws also permitted early wrist range of motion and shorter periods of immobilization. In this article, we describe our surgical technique of harvesting the 2,3 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicled vascularized bone graft. The anatomy, indications, contraindications, and complications of treatment are also detailed.
“…Negative scan results were found to be associated with the later occurrence of complications (non-union, osteomyelitis) or total graft failure, while positive scan results correlated with uncomplicated graft healing. In animal experiments it has been shown that a positive scintigram later than 1 week after surgery does not necessarily indicate an intact blood supply; rather it may also be due to new bone formed by creeping substitution on the surface of a graft whose major portion is not viable [4,21,22]. Nevertheless, negative scan results obtained later than 1 week (up to 6 weeks) after surgery in patients who received revascularized grafts have been found always to be associated with complications [2,23].…”
Bone scintigraphy was applied in the follow-up of 24 patients who received bone grafts for reconstruction of the mandible after partial resection. Semiquantitative assessment of the grafts was done with a six-grade scoring system, based on comparison of tracer uptake in the graft and in the calvarium (as an internal control). Sixty-nine bone scans were evaluated. Late planar imaging was carried out in all cases, and single-photon emission tomography (SPET) was performed additionally in 34 of these cases. Complications were observed in four grafts. They occurred less frequently in revascularized grafts than in non-revascularized grafts. Planar scintigrams performed within 14 days after reconstruction showed a significantly higher tracer uptake in grafts with an uncomplicated further course than in those which developed complications. Follow-up scintigrams after 1 and 3 months revealed a significant increase in tracer uptake in grafts with an uncomplicated course. This was not apparent in grafts which developed complications. The tracer uptake was estimated to be higher on the basis of the SPET scans as compared with the planar scintigrams. It is concluded that bone scintigraphy is of prognostic value in the evaluation of bone grafts used for mandibular reconstruction. SPET seems to be more sensitive than planar imaging for the assessment of graft viability.
“…15,16 Surrounding necrotic bone may even be revascularized and recolonized by osteocytes from the circulation provided by the graft. 15,16 Techniques that introduce living vascularized bone provide an excellent option for difficult-to-treat fractures in regions with poor local blood supply such as the scaphoid proximal pole or waist fractures with proximal pole avascular necrosis. 11Y13 pollicis brevis to treat a scaphoid waist fracture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 As circulation and viable osteoclasts and osteoblasts are maintained, healing may be accelerated. 15,16 Vascularized grafts may provide replacement for deficient bone with less resorption and loss of structural integrity than traditional bone grafting. 15,16 Surrounding necrotic bone may even be revascularized and recolonized by osteocytes from the circulation provided by the graft.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 Vascularized grafts may provide replacement for deficient bone with less resorption and loss of structural integrity than traditional bone grafting. 15,16 Surrounding necrotic bone may even be revascularized and recolonized by osteocytes from the circulation provided by the graft. 15,16 Techniques that introduce living vascularized bone provide an excellent option for difficult-to-treat fractures in regions with poor local blood supply such as the scaphoid proximal pole or waist fractures with proximal pole avascular necrosis.…”
Fractures of the scaphoid, particularly its proximal pole, are at risk of progressing to nonunion because of the tenuous, retrograde blood supply. The overall incidence of scaphoid fractures developing nonunion ranges from 10% to 15%, whereas proximal pole fractures of the scaphoid can have up to a 30% incidence of nonunion. Avascular necrosis of these proximal pole fractures can occur in 14% to 39% of cases. Dorsal distal radius vascularized pedicled bone grafting is an alternative to conventional measures for the treatment of displaced proximal pole fractures, established nonunions, and avascular necrosis of the proximal fragment. This graft is based on the 1,2-intercompartmental supraretinacular artery, which has reliable anatomy and predictable course between the first and second extensor compartments. The graft can be harvested and inset into the prepared fracture site using a single-incision approach. The indications, contraindications, technique, and results of treatment are reviewed and detailed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.