2019
DOI: 10.1177/1461348419868860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental validation of the proposed extended Kalman filter with unknown inputs algorithm based on data fusion

Abstract: The extended Kalman filter is a useful tool in the research of structural health monitoring and vibration control. However, the traditional extended Kalman filter approach is only applicable when the information of external inputs to structures is available. In recent years, some improved extended Kalman filter methods applied with unknown inputs have been proposed. The authors have proposed an extended Kalman filter with unknown inputs based on data fusion of partially measured displacement and acceleration r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, when only acceleration data is used, the joint input-state estimation based on the Kalman filter is prone to the force drift problem [42]. Some researchers solved this problem by introducing partial displacement or strain data [27][28][29], however, it may not be a cost-effective solution. In the proposed method, the PM algorithm is used to solve the force drift problem without additional measurement data, which is achieved by applying sparse constraints on the force vectors.…”
Section: Input Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, when only acceleration data is used, the joint input-state estimation based on the Kalman filter is prone to the force drift problem [42]. Some researchers solved this problem by introducing partial displacement or strain data [27][28][29], however, it may not be a cost-effective solution. In the proposed method, the PM algorithm is used to solve the force drift problem without additional measurement data, which is achieved by applying sparse constraints on the force vectors.…”
Section: Input Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The force drift problem means that the low-frequency component of the estimated force deviates from the true steady-state position, while the high-frequency information of the estimated force can be relatively accurate. Some researchers have proposed that partial displacement or strain data [26][27][28][29] could be used to solve this problem. However, this may not be a cost-effective solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the acceleration response at the locations of the unknown excitation loadings is unknown; therefore, D|k+1ku=0 in Equation (16), which means the measurement/observation equation does not contain the unknown excitation loading fk+1u. Currently, most of the existing EKF‐UI approaches 32,33 require the existence of unknown forces in the measurement equation; that is, D|k+1ku stands for a full‐rank matrix. In this paper, an UGEKF‐UI is developed to circumvent the limitations of the existing EKF‐UI methods.…”
Section: Nonparametric Identification With Partial Output Excluding A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al 32 presented a data fusion‐based EKF with unknown inputs (EKF‐UI) approach for simultaneous identification of structural parameters and unknown excitations. Based on the method proposed by Liu et al, an EKF‐UI algorithm combined with data fusion using both acceleration and strain measurements was proposed by Huang et al 33 and a five‐story shear building model was used to verify the feasibility of the proposed method. By introducing a projection matrix in the observation equation, a time‐domain EKF‐based approach was proposed by He et al 34 for simultaneous identification of structural parameters and the unknown excitations with limited outputs, where unknown input was identified using a least‐squares estimation approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the identification algorithm in Stage I, the identified structural parameters are shown and compared to the exact parameters in Table 5. The exact values of stiffness and damping parameters are obtained by experiments referred from the reference 47 …”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%