Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas 2011
DOI: 10.1201/b11396-103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental validation of steel post-tensioned connections with web hourglass pins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2(a) shows the free body diagram of an external PT connection where d 1u and d 1l are the distances of the upper and lower WHPs from the center of rotation that is assumed to be at the inner edge of the beam flange reinforcing plates; d 2 is the distance of the PT bars from the center of rotation; T is the total force in both PT bars; F WHP,u and F WHP,l are the forces in the upper and lower WHPs; C F is the compressive force in the beam-column interface; V C1u and V C1l are the shear forces in the upper and lower column, M is the PT connection moment, V is the beam shear force; and N is the horizontal clamping force that is transferred to the beam-column interface through the slab diaphragm and the beam. Figure 2(c) shows the theoretical cyclic moment-rotation (M-θ) behavior of the PT connection with WHPs, which has been verified by the large-scale experiments conducted by Vasdravellis et al [15]. After decompression of the PT connection (Point 1 in Figure 2(c)), gap opens and the behavior becomes nonlinear elastic with rotational stiffness S 1 .…”
Section: Sc-mrfs Using Pt Connections With Whpssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 2(a) shows the free body diagram of an external PT connection where d 1u and d 1l are the distances of the upper and lower WHPs from the center of rotation that is assumed to be at the inner edge of the beam flange reinforcing plates; d 2 is the distance of the PT bars from the center of rotation; T is the total force in both PT bars; F WHP,u and F WHP,l are the forces in the upper and lower WHPs; C F is the compressive force in the beam-column interface; V C1u and V C1l are the shear forces in the upper and lower column, M is the PT connection moment, V is the beam shear force; and N is the horizontal clamping force that is transferred to the beam-column interface through the slab diaphragm and the beam. Figure 2(c) shows the theoretical cyclic moment-rotation (M-θ) behavior of the PT connection with WHPs, which has been verified by the large-scale experiments conducted by Vasdravellis et al [15]. After decompression of the PT connection (Point 1 in Figure 2(c)), gap opens and the behavior becomes nonlinear elastic with rotational stiffness S 1 .…”
Section: Sc-mrfs Using Pt Connections With Whpssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…SC-MRFs exhibit softening force-drift behavior and eliminate beam inelastic deformations and residual drifts (RDs) as the result of gap opening developed in beam-column interfaces and elastic PT bars which clamp beams to the columns and provide self-centering capability. PT connections use yielding-based [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] or friction-based [20][21][22][23] energy dissipation devices, which are activated when gaps open and can be easily replaced if damaged. Seismic design procedures for SC-MRFs have been proposed in [24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SC-MRFs exhibit softening force-drift behavior and eliminate beam inelastic deformations and residual drifts as the result of gap opening developed in beam-column interfaces and elastic PT bars which clamp beams to the columns and provide self-centering capability. PT connections use yielding-based [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] or friction-based [20][21][22][23] energy dissipation devices, which are activated when gaps open and can be easily replaced if damaged. Seismic design procedures for SC-MRFs have been proposed in [24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the seismic collapse risk of SC-MRFs with viscous dampers subjected to near-fault ground motions is evaluated and compared to that of ordinary MRFs. The recently developed PT connection with web hourglass shape pins (WHPs) [15,18] is utilized for the SC-MRFs. A prototype steel building is designed using different seismicresistant frames, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%