54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-0128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Validation of Expanded Centerbodiless RDE Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As will be discussed in Section 4.4, the number of alternative designs to the annulus is limited. An exception is the hollow cylinder model to determine the effects of having no inner wall on the detonation wave as well as the practical feasibility [50].…”
Section: Existing Rde Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As will be discussed in Section 4.4, the number of alternative designs to the annulus is limited. An exception is the hollow cylinder model to determine the effects of having no inner wall on the detonation wave as well as the practical feasibility [50].…”
Section: Existing Rde Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hollow RDEs, dubbed "centrebodiless" designs, have been tested with two different designs [50,61]. One design was identical to a conventional RDE 100 mm across, but the inner cylinder terminated parallel to the fuel/oxidiser injectors [61].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations