43rd AIAA Thermophysics Conference 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-3190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental validation of an aircraft infrared signature code for commercial airliners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this gap cannot be explained only by the optical behavior of the surfaces of the nozzle; an assessment of wall temperatures has to be performed. Further recent investigations consisting in comparing calculated and experimental B737 IRS for several aspect angles, show that a good agreement is obtained for the front and rear views, except for side views [31]. Theses results confirm that the thermal model of the external rear part of the engine has to be improved, whereas the internal temperature prediction inside the nozzle is sufficient.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Therefore, this gap cannot be explained only by the optical behavior of the surfaces of the nozzle; an assessment of wall temperatures has to be performed. Further recent investigations consisting in comparing calculated and experimental B737 IRS for several aspect angles, show that a good agreement is obtained for the front and rear views, except for side views [31]. Theses results confirm that the thermal model of the external rear part of the engine has to be improved, whereas the internal temperature prediction inside the nozzle is sufficient.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For first period, the experimental studies had been focused on the military aircraft infrared signature measurement and aircraft type recognition, too. Later, the practical measurement of the civilian large aircraft infrared radiation signatures (Coiro et al, 2012), the radiation modeling and countermeasure became to set of important tasks. Parallel, to these, the infrared radiation sensor technology (Rogalski, 2012) has been developed rapidly, too.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both have the same objective target recognition. Several papers list the codes using in investigation of the aircraft infrared radiation (Coiro et al, 2012;McGlynn, Auerbach, 1997;Mahulikar et al, 2007) from SIGGE of Swedish Defence Research that can be applied to compute the aircraft infrared signature, especially effects from nozzles and plumes; trough the US code SPIRITS, NATO's NIRATAM validated on large set of military aircraft; code SIRUS generated by large companies Lockheed Martin UK INSYS and BAE Systems until commercial codes SE-WORKBENCH, Radtherm-IR, SAFIR and SEISM. The Belgium Defence establishment has developed an open-source code OSMOSIS for compute the ships infrared signature that can be applied to the Arial vehicles, too.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulation of the infrared image of targets, the Monte Carlo (MC) method is mostly in use both for the temperature calculation and the infrared image calculation based on the targets' temperature distribution [2][3] . Also the for the temperature calculation, the forward Monte Carlo method [4][5] is suitable, but for the image calculation, due to the usually long distance between the detector and the targets the backward Monte Carlo method (BMC) [6][7][8][9] is more efficient than the forward Monte Carlo method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%