2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.79.062324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Uhrig dynamical decoupling using trapped ions

Abstract: We present a detailed experimental study of the Uhrig Dynamical Decoupling (UDD) sequence in a variety of noise environments. Our qubit system consists of a crystalline array of 9 Be + ions confined in a Penning trap. We use an electron-spin-flip transition as our qubit manifold and drive qubit rotations using a 124 GHz microwave system. We study the effect of the UDD sequence in mitigating phase errors and compare against the well known CPMG-style multipulse spin echo as a function of pulse number, rotation a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
180
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
180
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a method to incorporate shaped pulses of finite amplitude into UDD paves the way of realistic experiments [20]. UDD was first verified in experiments by microwave control of trapped ions in various artificial classical noises [21][22][23], and then UDD against realistic quantum noises was realized for radical electron spins in irradiated malonic acid crystals [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a method to incorporate shaped pulses of finite amplitude into UDD paves the way of realistic experiments [20]. UDD was first verified in experiments by microwave control of trapped ions in various artificial classical noises [21][22][23], and then UDD against realistic quantum noises was realized for radical electron spins in irradiated malonic acid crystals [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to its high-order suppression of decoherence (at least in theory), UDD for singlequbit decoherence suppression could be powerful because it works for most general system-bath coupling [10], for a bath that has unknown spectral density (but with a sharp cut-off), and for time-dependent system-bath Hamiltonians as well [15]. Experimental studies of UDD under two specific situations have been reported [16][17][18]. For a recent concise review on UDD-related theoretical studies, see Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are the basis of the dynamical decoupling techniques that are applied to beat the decoherence process [26]. Furthermore, even in this very short time scale, the time that each measurement is applied can be very precise, as we can see, for example, in the experimental realization of the Uhrig dynamical decoupling, the Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill-style multipulse spin echo [25], and others. This implies that the scenario studied in the paper is very realistic and that any MBQC realized with ultrafast measurements needs to account for the oscillatory behavior of the dynamics.…”
Section: B Measurements Performed At the Same Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again we see that at times such as t gap = 15.9/ω c , t gap = 31.6/ω c , or t gap = 47.3/ω c , we have a gate fidelity of 96%, 95%, and 93%, respectively, while at times such as t gap = 8.4/ω c , t gap = 24.8/ω c , or t gap = 40.4/ω c , we have a gate fidelity of 22%, 34%, and 44%. It is important to emphasize that ultrafast measurements, which have to be performed in the very short bath correlation time scale, can be produced with current technology [24,25]. These are the basis of the dynamical decoupling techniques that are applied to beat the decoherence process [26].…”
Section: B Measurements Performed At the Same Timementioning
confidence: 99%