2014
DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental three-photon quantum nonlocality under strict locality conditions

Abstract: Quantum correlations are critical to our understanding of nature, with far-reaching technological [1][2][3][4] and fundamental impact. These often manifest as violations of Bell's inequalities [5][6][7][8], bounds derived from the assumptions of locality and realism, concepts integral to classical physics. Many tests of Bell's inequalities have studied pairs of correlated particles; however, the immense interest in multi-particle quantum correlations is driving the experimental frontier to test systems beyond … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be secure, they must close two spacetime loopholes: no basis choice may influence a distant particle (locality loophole), and the entanglement generation must not influence the basis choices (freedom-ofchoice loophole). Current efforts [6,7,[12][13][14] to simultaneously close the detection [4,6,7], locality [3], and freedom-of-choice (FoC) [5,8] loopholes require random number generators (RNGs) with an unprecedented combination of speed, unpredictability, and confidence [15][16][17].Here we combine ultrafast RNG by accelerated laser phase diffusion [18][19][20] with real-time randomness extraction and metrological randomness assurances [21] to produce a RNGs suitable for loophole-free Bell tests. Because the laser phase diffusion is driven by effects, including spontaneous emission, that are unpredictable both in quantum theory and in an important class of stochastic hidden variable theories, the source can be used to address the "freedom-of-choice" loophole [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be secure, they must close two spacetime loopholes: no basis choice may influence a distant particle (locality loophole), and the entanglement generation must not influence the basis choices (freedom-ofchoice loophole). Current efforts [6,7,[12][13][14] to simultaneously close the detection [4,6,7], locality [3], and freedom-of-choice (FoC) [5,8] loopholes require random number generators (RNGs) with an unprecedented combination of speed, unpredictability, and confidence [15][16][17].Here we combine ultrafast RNG by accelerated laser phase diffusion [18][19][20] with real-time randomness extraction and metrological randomness assurances [21] to produce a RNGs suitable for loophole-free Bell tests. Because the laser phase diffusion is driven by effects, including spontaneous emission, that are unpredictable both in quantum theory and in an important class of stochastic hidden variable theories, the source can be used to address the "freedom-of-choice" loophole [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space-like separating the two outcome events enforces outcome independence, and space-like separating each party's independent setting choice event from the opposite party's outcome event enforces setting independence. In this way, the locality loophole is considered to have been closed for photons by the experiments [17][18][19][20][21], and with NV centers by the experiment [22].…”
Section: A the Locality Loopholementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, space-like separation of the pair generation from the setting choices eliminates the pair generation as a possible influence. This has been achieved in the experiments [18][19][20][21]. However, again it is not possible to exclude all possible influences in this way, because these could in principle extend arbitrarily far into the past.…”
Section: B the Freedom-of-choice Loopholementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The red squre represents fidelity of reconstruction using our protocol. Figure 7 depicts a typical scheme for measuring a polarization-encoded n-photon state [19][20][21][22][23][24]. Quarter-and half-waveplates in each photon's path are rotated to choose a separable polarization basis.…”
Section: B Pure State Tomography For a 3-qubit Statementioning
confidence: 99%