2018
DOI: 10.4236/msce.2018.64019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Testing and Validation of the Mathematical Model for a Self-Humidifying PEM Fuel Cell

Abstract: This paper presents an experimental testing and validation results for a zero-dimensional self-humidifying PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) fuel cell stack. The model incorporates major electric and thermodynamic variables and parameters involved in the operation of the PEM fuel cell under different operational conditions. The mathematical equations are modelled by using Matlab-Simulink tools in order to simulate the operation of the developed model with a commercially available 1 kW Horizon (H-1000) PEM fuel ce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the flow rates of supply hydrogen and air for the Horizon (H-1000) fuel cell stack, as presented in the previous published research work [16], and presented in Appendix A, Table A.1, at 20 A current and power of 990 W, the flow of supplied air is 1.766 m 3 /min (105.96 m 3 /hour), and the flow of supplied hydrogen is 11.85 L/min (0.711 m 3 /hour or 0.064 kg/hour). Based on the developed model of the PEM fuel cell stack of 72 cells as presented in [14,17] at 20 A current and power of 877 W, the flow of supplied air is 97.9162 m 3 /hour, and the flow of supplied hydrogen is 0.6368 m 3 /hour. Where, at standard temperature and pressure, the density of dry air is 1.225 kg/m 3 , the density of oxygen is 1.429 kg/m 3 , the ratio of oxygen to air is 21%, and the density of hydrogen is 0.0899 kg/m 3 .…”
Section: Hydrogen and Air-oxygen Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the flow rates of supply hydrogen and air for the Horizon (H-1000) fuel cell stack, as presented in the previous published research work [16], and presented in Appendix A, Table A.1, at 20 A current and power of 990 W, the flow of supplied air is 1.766 m 3 /min (105.96 m 3 /hour), and the flow of supplied hydrogen is 11.85 L/min (0.711 m 3 /hour or 0.064 kg/hour). Based on the developed model of the PEM fuel cell stack of 72 cells as presented in [14,17] at 20 A current and power of 877 W, the flow of supplied air is 97.9162 m 3 /hour, and the flow of supplied hydrogen is 0.6368 m 3 /hour. Where, at standard temperature and pressure, the density of dry air is 1.225 kg/m 3 , the density of oxygen is 1.429 kg/m 3 , the ratio of oxygen to air is 21%, and the density of hydrogen is 0.0899 kg/m 3 .…”
Section: Hydrogen and Air-oxygen Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stainless-steel materials are chosen based on their specifications in offering high yield strength, high stress resistance, high corrosion resistance, and their availability in a decent range of thicknesses, also their suitability in storing high pressurised gases for aerospace and industrial applications. However, all calculations related to the design of pressure vessels and power-plant mass estimations in the following sections of this research will be determined based on the developed model of the PEM fuel cell stack in [14,17], and the proposed equations (3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 15) above.…”
Section: Hydrogen and Air-oxygen Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gudmundsson [23] claimed that efficiency of the propeller varies throughout the different phases of the aircraft's flight. Saleh et al [24,25] claimed that for a 1 kW PEM fuel cell, Horizon operates at a maximum output of 877 W with a current rating of 20 A, achieving 87.7% efficiency. Therefore, in this research, the propeller efficiency is assumed to be 80%.…”
Section: Power and Mass Estimation Of Unmanned Aircraft System-based Pem Fuel Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumptions for constraint calculations for the UAS power by a 1 kW PEM fuel cell system are as given in Table 7, by substituting the values of Table 7 in Eqs. (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) to determine the relation between thrust-toweight ratio T/W and the wing loading W/S of the design as presented in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Design Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%