2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.102.032621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental test of nonclassicality with arbitrarily low detection efficiency

Abstract: We theoretically introduce and experimentally demonstrate the realization of a nonclassicality test that allows for arbitrarily low detection efficiency without invoking any extra assumptions as independence of the devices. Our test and its implementation is set in a prepare-and-measure scenario with an upper limit on the communication capacity of the channel through which the systems are communicated. The essence for our novel test is the use of two preparation and two measurement devices, which are randomly … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance in two randomness expansion experiments presented in [58,59] the parties Alice and Bob were separated by about 200 m. A novel method for overcoming the locality loophole is given in [60] where a method of quantifying the amount of crosstalk was estimated. A complementary approach exhibiting crosstalk in experiments, but not considered in the framework of randomness certification was delivered by some of us in [61]. In this work, we do not address the problem of closing the loopholes, and leave them for future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance in two randomness expansion experiments presented in [58,59] the parties Alice and Bob were separated by about 200 m. A novel method for overcoming the locality loophole is given in [60] where a method of quantifying the amount of crosstalk was estimated. A complementary approach exhibiting crosstalk in experiments, but not considered in the framework of randomness certification was delivered by some of us in [61]. In this work, we do not address the problem of closing the loopholes, and leave them for future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the adversary cannot know in advance how they will be paired, then the adversary must resort to using common seed to all the parts, e.g., a synchronized timer. In this case, correlations between inputs and outputs will be observed, as discussed in [16]. (ii) When a signal sent from an external synchronizer causes correlations between P and M. This case can be avoided by invoking a standard assumption in all cryptographic schemes, namely, that P and M are inside a shielded laboratory, and thus a shared seed cannot be sent from the outside.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining a value greater than T c from the observed statistics certifies the communicated quantum system to be of at least dimension d. Quantum random access codes (QRACs), a primitive quantum communication protocol [13][14][15], can be used for this purpose. The original study of QRACs was restricted to two-dimensional systems [11] and was later generalized to higher dimensions [16][17][18] yielding several interesting results in quantum communication [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%