2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41062-021-00615-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental test and finite element modelling prediction on geopolymer concrete beams subject to flexural loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geopolymer concrete beams have been analyzed numerically by nonlinear finite element analysis (NLFEA) using in-house programs [7] or commercial software packages [8]; the resulting deflections were found to be similar to the experimental results [6][7][8][9][10]. Hassan et al [11] investigated GC beams containing steel fibers experimentally and numerically using the nonlinear finite element analysis software ABAQUS 6.11 [12] and showed that compressive strength and stiffness increased due to the incorporation of steel fibers. [13] showed that GC beams displayed slightly higher deflection for the same amount of load compared to normal concrete beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geopolymer concrete beams have been analyzed numerically by nonlinear finite element analysis (NLFEA) using in-house programs [7] or commercial software packages [8]; the resulting deflections were found to be similar to the experimental results [6][7][8][9][10]. Hassan et al [11] investigated GC beams containing steel fibers experimentally and numerically using the nonlinear finite element analysis software ABAQUS 6.11 [12] and showed that compressive strength and stiffness increased due to the incorporation of steel fibers. [13] showed that GC beams displayed slightly higher deflection for the same amount of load compared to normal concrete beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, Contrary to traditional cement-based concrete, the use of GPC is estimated to potentially reduce energy consumption by 44-64% and reduce carbon emissions by 9-80%. This observation range of emissions reduction is attributed to the intricate nature of emissions calculations, which vary based on numerous factors, such as local conditions, the specific design and transportation mix, and so on [73,[96][97][98]. As an illustration, the geopolymer binder generates CO 2 emissions ranging from 0.184 to 0.218 tons due to the combustion of carbon fuel, in contrast to 1 ton of CO 2 emitted by OPC [99].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since reinforced concrete walls have a high structural performance, they can effectively limit the building's lateral displacements during a seismic event and minimise the level of damage [5]. Various structural and architectural parameters (such as the height-to-length ratio, the existence of openings, cross-sectional arrangements and materials) highly influence the load-bearing capacity of such elements simultaneously and could also modify their nonlinear behaviour [6,7]. Moreover, in many cases, due to architectural requirements, walls may have complex shapes and require high steel ratios for increased bearing capacity, which increases wall construction time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%