“…Tubular-shaped constructs are difficult to be realized ( H.Nam et al, 2020 ), and many biomaterials have been proposed as scaffolds to promote esophageal tissue engineering reconstruction. Among them, gastric acellular matrices ( Urita et al, 2007 ), AlloDerm ® ( Isch et al, 2001 ), xenogeneic small intestinal submucosa (SIS) and urinary porcine bladder matrix (UBM) ( Badylak et al, 2000 ; Badylak et al, 2005 ; Poghosyan et al, 2015 ; Catry et al, 2017 ), porcine aorta ( Kajitani et al, 2001 ), esophageal acellular matrices ( Marzaro et al, 2006 ), retrievable synthetic scaffold carrying autologous cells ( La Francesca et al, 2018 ; Nam et al, 2020 ), mixed materials with bioinks ( Kajitani et al, 2001 ), PLC/PLGA (Polycaprolactone/poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid) tubular scaffolds ( Jensen et al, 2015 ), non-absorbable materials such as polyethylene terephthalate, polyurethane electro-spun scaffold ( Miki et al, 1999 ), and silicone or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene ( Gonzalez Saez et al, 2003 ). Above all, the use of pre-seeded scaffolds for full-circumferential esophageal reconstruction resulted in higher degree of regeneration and lower inflammation rates with respect to scaffolds implanted alone ( Tan et al, 2013 ).…”