2000
DOI: 10.1007/s001930050174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on the tuned operation of a free piston driver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the theory derived by Ref. 12, the 36 kg piston with a 76.2 mm orifice plate (the original shock tube dimension for T3) should fall into the soft impact region ensuring the usefulness of the condition (Figure 10). …”
Section: Iiia Free Piston Drivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the theory derived by Ref. 12, the 36 kg piston with a 76.2 mm orifice plate (the original shock tube dimension for T3) should fall into the soft impact region ensuring the usefulness of the condition (Figure 10). …”
Section: Iiia Free Piston Drivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 The basic characteristics of geometry and initial conditions are shown in Table 2. The offered data were mainly about the pressure histories at the end of the compression tube B, so the comparisons were focused in the pressure values.…”
Section: Validation Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the current set of tuned X2 driver conditions (two of which are shown in Table 1) were designed by Gildfind et al, 36,55 a maximum driver pressure of 40 MPa was set due to structural limits of the facility. 55 Considering that tuned conditions generally have an over-pressure after diaphragm rupture, 47,[56][57][58] it was decided by Gildfind et al 36,55 to set the maximum diaphragm rupture pressure to 35.7 MPa, which can be seen as the most powerful driver condition shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Actual X2 Performance Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%